Breakouts

Overview

Goal

Turn defending into attacking — the organised exit from your own defensive zone

Key

The breakout runs several times a shift, every shift, all game — you will see it called the most-run play in hockey, but no published count ranks plays by frequency

Risk

It falls apart because five players ran five different plays, not because anyone lacked skill

Convention

Almost everything here is a coaching choice, not a law of hockey — teams call the same play different names, and some call different plays the same name

Action

Learn the framework here, then find out what your team actually calls and actually runs

A breakout — your team's organised exit from your own end — is run several times a shift, every shift, all game. You will see it called the most-run play in hockey; treat that as an impression, because no published count ranks plays by frequency. At amateur level it fails for want of agreement, not skill: five players running five different plays.

Leaving with the puck is worth far more than flinging it clear. An analysis of roughly 230,000 tracked NHL exits — Corey Sznajder's manual tracking, covering roughly half the games of 2016-17 and 2017-18 rather than both seasons complete — found carrying or passing the puck out led to an attack the other way about 89% of the time, against about 20% for a clear nobody recovered — though the study's own conclusion is that possession is the explanation, not the method, and a clear your own team collects performs about as well. So keep the puck by default, and clear it because you have read the situation — outnumbered with nobody to pass to, or a turnover in front of your own net as the alternative — rather than by reflex.

Do not move the puck across the ice in front of your own goal — not with a pass, not by skating it — unless the read is unmistakable. The route to the far side is behind your own net, where an interception means very little; the same pass in front of the net is a point-blank chance against. The one exception is the cross-ice "over" in section 3, which accepts exactly that risk deliberately: it needs a forecheck genuinely over-loaded to one side with the middle empty, and where the behind-the-net route exists you take that instead.

Under pressure on the side wall, where you send the puck depends on the chaser. Sealed against the wall, send it onward around the curve of the rink to a teammate further round — hard and low, because a soft one dies in the corner and is a gift. Over-skated by someone who cannot stop, send it back the way you came into the space they have left, and whoever arrives there must call for it, because you are looking the other way.

Almost everything else is a coaching choice, not a law of hockey. Where the wingers stand, and whether the centre stays back or leaves early, differ from team to team; teams call the same play different names, and some call different plays the same name. Learn the shapes, then ask which your team runs — starting with what they mean by "over", a word that names both one of the safest plays here and the riskiest.

---

A Note on Language

Terms used throughout, defined once here:

• Strong side — the side of the ice the puck is currently on. Weak side — the opposite side.
• Low — closer to your own goal line. High — closer to the blue line you're facing.
• The wall — the boards along the side of the rink. "On the wall" means playing tight to the boards.
• The hash marks — the short red lines marking the outer edges of each faceoff circle, two feet long and 5'7" apart, four per circle (NHL Rule 1.9): a pair on the boards side and a pair on the middle-of-the-ice side. They sit level with the faceoff dot, which in your own end is twenty feet out from the goal line — a long way above the crease, not beside it. They're the standard landmark for where a winger stands on the breakout, so getting the distance right matters. "On the wall at the hash marks" means the band on the boards between the hash-mark line and the goal line — at or just below the dot line, not above it. That is roughly the bottom third of the distance from the goal line to the blue line (which sits 64 feet out, Rule 1.5). Throughout this document, "between the hash marks and the goal line" is that same spot.
• Forecheck — pressure applied by the attacking team in your defensive zone, trying to stop your breakout. The opposite of a backcheck (racing back to defend your own end). Full treatment in Forechecking Systems.
• F1 / F2 / F3 — the forecheckers, numbered by order of arrival, not by position: F1 is whoever gets there first, F2 second, F3 third. These are roles, not people, and they change the moment the order of arrival does. Throughout this document they are the opposition, because a breakout is what you run against their forecheck.
• Outlet — a teammate available to receive the first pass out of the zone.
• The point — the area just inside the blue line, at the top of the offensive zone. When your opponents "have the point", that is where their defencemen are standing. Not to be confused with the half-wall, which is the boards level with the faceoff dot, far below it.
• The top of the circle — the edge of a faceoff circle furthest from the goal line, roughly 35 feet out. A common landmark for where a shot becomes dangerous.
• The slot — the ice directly in front of the net between the two faceoff circles, from the goalmouth out to the tops of the circles. The high slot is its upper part, dots to tops of circles; the goalmouth is the immediate net front. The home-plate area — also called the house — is a different shape from the slot, and a wider one. It runs square across the top along the tops of the two faceoff circles, comes straight down the dot lines to the two faceoff dots, 44 feet apart, and then angles in to the two goalposts, 6 feet apart on the goal line. Drawn out it looks like a baseball home plate with its point at the net: wide at the top, tapering to the width of the goalmouth — so it is widest where the slot is narrowest, and narrowest at the goal line. It is the most dangerous ice on the rink, where a shot is worth several times the same shot from outside it (Shooting covers the values and their qualifications; Rink Map and Glossary covers the shape, which is an analytics convention rather than an official marking). It is the ice you do not move the puck through on a breakout.

---

1. Controlled Exits vs Clears

The two ways out

Options

Only two categories of zone exit exist — a controlled exit or a clear

Goal

Controlled exit — leave the zone with the puck on a teammate's stick, carried out or passed out; possession is retained

Action

A clear is the puck put out of the zone with no particular teammate in mind — off the glass, off the boards, high down the ice

Risk

A clear surrenders possession, and whether you get it back is a coin flip at best

There are only two categories of zone exit, and they are not the same thing:

• A controlled exit — you leave the zone with the puck on a teammate's stick, either carried out or passed out. Possession is retained.
• A clear (or dump-out) — you put the puck out of the zone with no particular teammate in mind: off the glass, off the boards, high down the ice. Possession is surrendered, and whether you get it back is a coin flip at best.

Why controlled exits matter

Key

An analysis of roughly 230,000 tracked NHL zone exits found controlled exits led to a subsequent zone entry about 89% of the time, unrecovered dump-outs about 20%

Key

The tracking underneath it is Corey Sznajder's manual dataset — roughly half the games of 2016-17 and 2017-18, not two complete seasons

Key

The study's own conclusion is that possession is the explanation, not the method — a dump-out your team recovers performs about as well as a controlled exit

Goal

A clean breakout is what gives you a carried entry; a panicked clear is what gives you a dump-in against a set defence

The tracking research is unusually one-sided on this. An analysis of roughly 230,000 tracked NHL zone exits, published on Hockey Graphs — the tracking underneath it is Corey Sznajder's manual dataset, roughly half the games of the 2016-17 and 2017-18 seasons rather than both seasons complete, and Hockey Graphs is the analysis rather than the tracker — found that controlled exits (carry-outs and pass-outs) led to a subsequent zone entry about 89% of the time, while unrecovered dump-outs did so about 20% of the time — controlled exits were close to four times more likely to produce the next attack. Crucially, the study's own conclusion is that possession is the explanation, not the method: a dump-out your team recovers performs about as well as a controlled exit. It is losing the puck that hurts, not the shape of the play.

The breakout connects to the other half of the transition chain. The reference work on zone entries is Eric Tulsky, Geoffrey Detweiler, Robert Spencer and Corey Sznajder, Using Zone Entry Data To Separate Offensive, Neutral, And Defensive Zone Performance (2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference), which hand-tracked 330 NHL games from 2011-12. Their headline finding, in their own words: "carrying the puck across the blue line generates more than twice as many shots, scoring chances, and goals as dumping the puck in." At 5-on-5 their tracked rates were 0.53–0.62 shots per carry-in against 0.22–0.28 per dump-in — and "shots" there means unblocked shot attempts (shots on goal plus misses), not shots on goal, so do not set those figures against a shots-on-goal rate. Zone Entries covers the numbers and that qualification. A clean breakout is what gives you a carried entry; a panicked clear is what gives you a dump-in against a set defence. Full treatment, including the break-even maths on when a dump is genuinely correct, in Zone Entries.

When a clear is the right play

Mindset

Clearing is a decision, not a reflex

Read

Clear when you are outnumbered low with no outlet, when the alternative is a turnover in the slot, when you need a line change, or late in a game you are leading

Priority

A clear costs you possession; a slot turnover costs you a goal — that trade is never close

Rule

A clear taken for a line change is only a rest if it does not ice — NHL and IIHF Rule 81.4 let the icing team substitute only for injury, a returning pulled goalie or a strength-changing penalty, and Rule 87.1 denies it a time-out

Rule

That no-change bar is not universal — USA Hockey's Rule 624 attaches no substitution restriction to an icing at all, and Hockey Canada's 6.7(d) applies its no-change rule only in U18AAA, Junior and, at the Member's option, Senior

Rule

A shorthanded team may ice the puck freely — NHL Rule 81.1 applies icing only to a team "equal or superior in numerical strength" — but two carve-outs cut it: a major with an empty penalty bench, and USA Hockey's classification limit. IIHF 81.6 carries neither

Rule

NHL Rule 81.6 withdraws that icing exemption from a team short by a major with an empty penalty bench

Rule

IIHF Rule 81.6 has no such clause, so in Britain — which plays the IIHF book — the shorthanded exemption is not withdrawn; see UK and England Rules

Rule

USA Hockey grants the shorthanded icing exemption only from Youth 15-Only, Girls 16U, High School and Adult upward (Rule 624(b)(1))

Action

Default to the controlled exit; take the clear when the read says take it

Never

Clear by default and attempt control only when the ice is already empty — most amateur teams have this backwards

None of that makes clearing wrong. It makes clearing a decision rather than a reflex. Get the puck out without possession when:

• You are outnumbered low and no outlet exists — three forecheckers, two of you, nobody free.
• You are beaten and the alternative is a turnover in the slot. A clear costs you possession; a slot turnover costs you a goal. That trade is never close.
• You are on the penalty kill — in most rule sets. A shorthanded team may ice the puck freely (NHL Rule 81.1 applies icing only to a team "equal or superior in numerical strength"), and where that holds, clearing is the entire strategy. It does not hold everywhere: USA Hockey grants the exemption only at Youth 15-Only and above, Girls 16U and above, High School and Adult (Rule 624(b)(1)), and NHL Rule 81.6 withdraws it from a team shorthanded by a major with an empty penalty bench. The IIHF's 81.6 — the rule British hockey plays under — carries neither restriction. Its two paragraphs cover only numerical strength and the timing of an expiring penalty; there is no major-penalty clause, and IIHF Rule 20.3 attaches no icing sanction to the requirement to keep a substitute in the penalty box. Special Teams covers the rule; check yours before the kill's whole plan rests on it, and see UK and England Rules for which book is yours.
• You need a line change. Getting the puck the length of the ice away — the rink is 200 feet long (Rule 1.2) — buys you time to get tired legs off. ⚠️ Only if it does not ice, though, and that is the trap in this one. Under NHL and IIHF Rule 81.4 a team that ices the puck may substitute before the ensuing draw only "to replace a goalkeeper who had been substituted for an extra attacker, to replace an injured player, or when a penalty has been assessed which affects the on-ice strength of either team", and Rule 87.1 denies it a time-out as well — so a clear taken for the change buys you a defensive-zone faceoff with the same tired legs still out there. Get it out off the glass or off the boards short of the centre red line rather than the length of the ice — over the glass is a delay-of-game minor, not a clear. USA Hockey imposes neither restriction, and Hockey Canada's applies to some categories only: its Rule 6.7(d) confines the "'no-change on icing' rule" to "[i]n categories of U18AAA, Junior, and at the option of the Member in Senior", so in every other category under that book — minor and female hockey included — the clear does buy you the change. (How much time depends entirely on how quickly they retrieve and regroup; there is no measured figure for it, so this document does not offer one.) See Game Management.
• Late in a game you're leading. Risk tolerance drops; simple gets you the two points. See Risk Management.

The habit to build: default to the controlled exit, take the clear when the read says take it. Most amateur teams have this backwards — they clear by default and attempt control only when the ice is already empty.

---

2. The Five Roles in Every Breakout

Whatever play is called, five jobs exist. Knowing which one is yours before the puck is retrieved is most of the battle.

1. The puck-retriever D (D1)

Position

The defenceman who goes back for the puck — your job starts before you touch it

Action

Look over your inside shoulder on the way back, while you still have time to change your plan

Technique

Arrive at an angle, not straight on. Curl in so your first touch already has your body opening toward the ice

Action

Take the puck to a decision point — behind the net or up the wall — rather than stopping on it

Never

Through the slot — not with a pass, not with your feet; the cross-ice over in section 3 is the only exception, and it is the highest-risk of the nine breakout options

Risk

A stationary defenceman is the one who gets hit, and at the puck with your back turned you are guessing

The defenceman who goes back for the puck. Your job starts before you touch it:

• Look over your inside shoulder on the way back. You need to know where the forecheck is coming from while you still have time to change your plan. Once you're at the puck with your back turned, you're guessing. See Scanning and Anticipation.
• Arrive at an angle, not straight on. Approaching the puck square to the end boards leaves you facing the wall with a forechecker arriving in your back. Curl in so your first touch already has your body opening toward the ice.
• Take the puck to a decision point — behind the net or up the wall — rather than stopping on it. A stationary defenceman is the one who gets hit.
• Never through the slot. Not with a pass, not with your feet. See Defender. The single exception is the cross-ice "over" in section 3, the highest-risk of the nine breakout options, which needs a read most shifts never give you.

2. The support D (D2)

Position

Usually the opposite side of the net from your partner, level with or slightly above the goal line, so a pass behind the net reaches you cleanly

Action

Be an option, not a spectator. Be the second wave, because if the first option fails the puck comes back to you

Key

You are usually the one who makes the call — "up", "over", "wheel", "reverse", "rim", "time", "man on" — because you can see the forecheck arriving behind your partner

Never

Screen the net front for the wheel if you play under USA Hockey, because 625(a.1) makes a protective screen for a puck-carrying teammate a minor, standing still or not; the NHL and IIHF permit it

Rule

NHL Rule 56.1 — "a player is always entitled to use his body position to lengthen an opponent's path to the puck", but only "provided his stick is not utilized… his free hand is not used and he does not take advantage of his body position to deliver an otherwise illegal check"

Rule

NHL Rule 56.1 and IIHF Rule 56.1 alike, so it is the British rule too — "Moving laterally and without establishing body position, then making contact with the non-puck carrier is not permitted and will be penalized as interference"

Rule

Moving into an opponent's path without initially having body position is a pick — a minor (NHL 56.2), not a ceiling: 56.4 a major on violence, 56.5 a game misconduct where that major injures, IIHF 56.5 a major plus game misconduct on reckless endangerment, NHL 21.1 a match for an attempt to injure

Rule

USA Hockey 625(a.1) makes a protective screen for a puck-carrying teammate a minor and Rule 625 caps itself there — but a check on a vulnerable or defenceless opponent with "no effort to play the puck" must go to the boarding, charging, checking-from-behind, head-contact or roughing rules

Rule

Where a pick goes to roughing, USA Hockey 640(g) is a major plus a game misconduct for recklessly endangering an opponent and 640(h), a match, both only for acts under 640(b–f) — and 602(a)'s match penalty for a player who "recklessly endangers or attempts to injure" sits outside 625 and 640 both

Technique

Stick in tight and vertical, hands to yourself, no bump as he goes past

Never

Drift across to meet him — a stick stuck out sideways across the slot is interference even though your feet never moved

The partner. This is the least-understood job on the ice and the one that makes breakouts work.

• Be an option, not a spectator. Position yourself so a pass behind the net reaches you cleanly — usually on the opposite side of the net, level with or slightly above the goal line.
• You are usually the one who makes the call. You can see the forecheck arriving behind your partner. "Up", "over", "wheel", "reverse", "rim", "time", "man on" — those calls are mostly yours. More in section 9.
• Occupy the net front for the wheel only if the book you play under allows it — and USA Hockey's does not. ⚠️ Take that split first, because most of what follows is the NHL's position and the IIHF's, not the American one. Under USA Hockey 625(a.1) a protective screen for a puck-carrying teammate is a minor whether or not you moved; the clause is quoted in full below. Under the NHL's book and the IIHF's — the one a British player is officiated under — it is legal, and the rest of this bullet is exactly what that entitlement is and is not. If your partner is carrying it around the net, being already standing in front of the net lengthens a forechecker's route across the slot. NHL Rule 56.1 is explicit that this is legal, and it writes three permissive sentences of which only the first carries no proviso: "A player is allowed the ice he is standing on (body position) and is not required to move in order to let an opponent proceed"; "A player may 'block' the path of an opponent provided he is in front of his opponent and moving in the same direction" — in front of him, and the same way, never across; and "a player is always entitled to use his body position to lengthen an opponent's path to the puck." IIHF Rule 56.1 is that same paragraph in the plural, with its defined terms set in quotation marks — "A Player is allowed the ice they are standing on (body position) and are not required to move" — so a British reader is under the same words. The lateral-movement sentence quoted below is word for word identical in the two books, bar the IIHF's quotation marks around "establishing body position" and "interference". Read the rest of that third sentence, because at the net front it is the part that gets called — the entitlement holds only "provided his stick is not utilized (to make himself 'bigger' and therefore considerably lengthening the distance his opponent must travel to get where he is going); his free hand is not used and he does not take advantage of his body position to deliver an otherwise illegal check." So: stick in tight and vertical, hands to yourself, and no bump as he goes past. A stick stuck out sideways across the slot is interference even though your feet never moved. And if he is already past you, the same paragraph says what you may not do about it: "A player who is behind an opponent, who does not have the puck, may not use his stick, body or free hand in order to restrain his opponent, but must skate in order to gain or reestablish his proper position in order to make a check." Skate; do not reach. And what is not legal is moving into him. The same rule: "Moving laterally and without establishing body position, then making contact with the non-puck carrier is not permitted and will be penalized as interference" — and a player who "moves into an opponent's path without initially having body position" is delivering a pick, and "an interference penalty shall be assessed" — the word minor living one rule further on, in 56.2 — and not capped there: 56.4 allows a major on the degree of violence, and the NHL's own game misconduct sits one step further on: 56.5 imposes one "when a major penalty is imposed under this rule for an infraction resulting in an injury of an opponent", so under the NHL book it takes an injury. Under the IIHF book it does not — 56.5 there reaches a major plus a game misconduct where it recklessly endangers, with nobody hurt. ⚠️ Do not read that as the NHL being the lenient book on this play, because the NHL's penalty ladder does not stop at Rule 56. NHL Rule 21.1 imposes a match penalty — ejection for the balance of the game — "on any player who deliberately attempts to injure or who deliberately injures an opponent in any manner". It is tied to no named foul and, for an attempt, needs no injury at all; it is the NHL's counterpart to USA Hockey's 602(a) below. Hockey Canada writes both of those tiers — the major-plus-ejection and the match penalty — into its interference rule itself. Hockey Canada Rule 8.3(b) allows "[a] Major penalty and Game Misconduct penalty, at the discretion of the Referee, based on the degree of violence of the impact", with nobody hurt — and makes the same pair mandatory against a player "who injures an opponent by an interference infraction that would otherwise call for a Minor penalty". Hockey Canada Rule 8.3(c) adds "[a] Match penalty ... to any player who attempts to injure or deliberately injures an opponent by interference." ⚠️ The IIHF book has no match penalty at all — the phrase is absent from both editions held here — so on that top tier Hockey Canada reaches one step beyond the book British hockey plays. ⚠️ USA Hockey is the one to know if you play in the States, and it is built differently. Its Rule 625 defines interference in the words of this exact play — using the body, "('pick' or 'block')", "to impede the progress of an opponent (non-puck carrier) with no effort to play the puck, maintain normal foot speed or maintain an established skating lane" — and its Standard of Play and Rule Emphasis – Restraining Fouls section lists as an example of interference "Using the body to establish a 'pick' or 'block' that prevents an opponent from being able to chase a puck carrier." ⚠️ And 625(a) goes further than that Note, in a clause that names this exact play. Its first enumerated instance of interference is "Providing a protective screen and limiting the opportunity for an opposing player to apply pressure to a teammate in possession or control of the puck" — a minor. Neither the NHL book nor the IIHF book contains that clause, and USA Hockey writes no body-position entitlement into any rule at all: its "entitled to stand their ground" sentence lives in the front matter, in the Declaration of Player Safety, Fair Play & Respect under Competitive Contact Category. ⚠️ Read it in its place, because the four bullets there are not alike, and the one nearest this play carries no proviso whatever: "A skater is entitled to stand their ground and is not required to move if an opponent wishes to skate through that area of the ice." The "body position between an opponent and the loose puck" condition belongs to the bullet above it — the skater maintaining their skating speed — and not to this one. What governs all four is the sentence they hang off: "Legal competitive contact occurs when players are focused on gaining possession of the puck and are simply maintaining legally established body position" — which a net-front screener whose own partner already has the puck genuinely fails, because he is not going for it. Hockey Canada Rule 8.3 and CARHA Rule 66(a) reach a narrower version of the same idea, barring the team in possession from "run[ning] deliberate interference for the puck carrier", which reads as a bar on moving rather than on standing. ⚠️ But under CARHA check who the standing permission is addressed to, because on a breakout it is not you. Rule 66(a) Note 2 gives it to the other side: "Often the action and movement of the attacking player causes the interference, since the defending players are entitled to 'stand their ground' or 'shadow' the attacking players" — and the bar on running interference is the very next sentence, aimed at "[p]layers of the side in possession of the puck". Your team has the puck on a breakout, so that Note grants your net-front partner nothing — and CARHA 66(a) itself allows the referee a major and a game misconduct for interference, not only a minor. CARHA governs CARHA-affiliated leagues and is not a general rec-hockey standard. ⚠️ No official interpretation of 625(a.1) is published. USA Hockey's separate Casebook volume reprints the clause and then rules on every neighbouring one but that: it runs seventeen situations under Rule 625, not one of them cites 625(a.1), and the string does not appear anywhere in the volume. So nothing held here settles how strictly a stationary net-front screen is called under that book. If you play under USA Hockey, ask your officials before you build a breakout around it. Rule 625 itself writes nothing above the minor. That is not the ceiling on the act. USA Hockey's Declaration of Player Safety, Fair Play & Respect directs that infractions arising from "a body check delivered to a vulnerable or defenseless player must be penalized under the boarding, charging, checking from behind, head contact or roughing rules", and that where it is "done in a dangerous, careless or reckless (unacceptable) manner where the player delivering the check has made no effort to play the puck, the major plus game misconduct or match penalty provisions of these rules must be assessed." Roughing is Rule 640, and 640(g) assesses "a major plus a game misconduct penalty ... to any player who recklessly endangers an opponent as a result of any actions falling under Rule 640(b, c, d, e or f)" — the sub-sections covering an avoidable check on a player no longer in control of the puck, a check delivered "with no effort to gain possession of the puck" with the stick blade above the knees, and a check on an opponent already physically engaged for the puck. 640(h) adds "a match penalty for reckless endangerment" under the same sub-sections. ⚠️ Note the scope of those sub-sections before you rely on them: 640(b), the avoidable check on a player no longer in control of the puck, is written "(except Adult Male Classifications)", while (d) and (e) carry no such limit — so in adult men's hockey the escalation route for this play runs through (d) and (e), not (b). And Rule 602(a) sits outside 625 and 640 both — a match penalty for any player who "recklessly endangers or attempts to injure any opposing player", tied to no named foul at all. ⚠️ The trigger is the state of the player you hit. USA Hockey counts a skater as vulnerable or defenceless when "unaware, unprepared, or unsuspecting of an impending hit" — which describes the forechecker whose eyes are on the puck when you step sideways into him. Whether a referee grades it that way is their judgement; the point is that the minor is a floor and not a ceiling under this book too. So: get to your spot early and hold it. Do not drift across to meet him. The difference between a free two seconds for your partner and a penalty that starts at two minutes is whether your feet were already planted.
• Be the second wave. If the first option fails, the puck comes back to you. Don't be somewhere it can't.

3. The strong-side winger

Position

The winger on the same side as the puck — the primary outlet

Position

You start high, up on the opposing point man, while the other team still has the puck

Action

Come down the wall as the breakout starts, to the boards between the hash marks and the goal line on the puck side

Key

Those two spots are a little under 44 to 64 ft apart — the point sits just inside the blue line, not on it — and belong to two different moments: the trip between them, and its timing, is the job

Action

Present a target and time your movement into the pass

Technique

Receive with your body open to the ice, not with your nose against the glass

The winger on the same side as the puck — the primary outlet, and the most commonly botched job in hockey (coaching emphasis rather than a counted ranking). Full detail in section 4.

• You start high, not low. While the other team still has the puck you are up on the opposing point man, covering him — that is your defensive-zone job, and Defensive Zone Coverage is the authority on it.
• You come down the wall as the breakout starts. The moment your team wins the puck — or your defenceman gets to it with time — you leave the point and drop to the wall between the hash marks and the goal line, on the same side as the puck. Those two spots are a little under 44 to 64 feet apart — the blue line is 64 ft out from the goal line and the point sits just inside it rather than on it, while the outlet band runs from level with the faceoff dot, 20 ft out from the goal line, down to the goal line itself (Rink Map and Glossary covers both figures) — and they belong to two different moments. The trip between them, and its timing, is the job; neither end of it is a place to live.
• Present a target and time your movement into the pass.
• Receive with your body open to the ice, not with your nose against the glass.

4. The weak-side winger

Position

The far winger — what you do here is genuinely system-dependent

Convention

Under the standard swing breakout, come across or up the middle as the second option and the outlet for a cross-ice or over play, then get out ahead of the puck

Convention

Under a "slash" or flying-winger structure, leave early through the middle toward the strong side or up ice, stretching the opposing defence vertically

Convention

Under a rim-heavy structure, you are the rim's target and you stay low on your own wall to collect it

Action

Find out which your team runs

Risk

Leaving early in a system that expects you low is the reason the breakout has no second option

The far winger. What you do here is genuinely system-dependent:

• Under the standard swing breakout (assumed throughout this document), you come across or up the middle as the second option and the outlet for a cross-ice or over play, then get out ahead of the puck.
• Under a "slash" or flying-winger structure, you leave early through the middle toward the strong side or up ice, stretching the opposing defence vertically and creating space behind you. This is deliberately more aggressive and leaves you less available defensively.
• Under a rim-heavy structure, you are the rim's target and you're staying low on your own wall to collect it.

Find out which your team runs. A weak-side winger who leaves early in a system that expects you low is the reason the breakout has no second option.

5. The centre

Position

Low support, underneath the puck — the pivot the whole structure turns on

Convention

The five-role structure is itself a coaching choice — the conventional swing breakout, taught by most development programmes and assumed throughout

Options

The centre fly — the centre leaves the zone early up the middle to stretch the ice, and the weak-side winger drops in to take the low support job instead

Options

Flat or spread breakouts — both wingers hold higher near the blue line and the exit is made with longer passes rather than short support

Action

Ask your coach which one you play

Risk

A centre flying in a system where the wingers hold high leaves nobody underneath the puck at all — the failure that produces most weekend breakdowns

Low support, underneath the puck. This is the pivot the whole structure turns on, and it is covered in full in section 5.

---

3. The Named Breakout Options

Each option below gets the same treatment: setup, the read that calls for it, execution, the risk, and how the opposition defeats it.

Two warnings on names before you start. First, teams disagree about these names — badly. Second, one collision is so common it deserves its own heading, and it is covered under "Over" below.

---

Up

Action

Direct pass from the puck-carrying defenceman to the strong-side winger on the wall — the fastest of the nine breakout options when the lane is open, though no count ranks them by speed

Position

D1 below the goal line or on the wall, the winger on the boards between the hash marks and the goal line, the centre low in the middle as the bail-out

Read

The forecheck has committed behind the net or to the middle, leaving the wall lane open — or F1 is arriving fast on the wrong side, so pass before F1 can influence the lane

Technique

Pass firmly and to the winger's stick, not to the boards behind them. Head up first, and aim where the winger will be, not where they were

Risk

The wall pass travels the lane a forecheck posts its wall-sealer in — F2 in a 2-1-2 — so intercepted at the hash marks it is a scoring chance from the top of the circle

Countered by

Any forecheck with a designated wall-sealer — F2 in a 2-1-2, the strong-side half-wall player in a 1-2-2 — or a weak-side defenceman stepping down on the winger the instant the pass leaves

The direct pass from the puck-carrying defenceman to the strong-side winger on the wall. The fastest of the nine breakout options when the lane is open — no count ranks breakout plays by speed — and, when it's there, the right one.

• Setup: D1 has the puck below the goal line or on the wall. The strong-side winger is on the boards between the hash marks and the goal line. The centre is low in the middle as the bail-out.
• The read: Take it when the forecheck has committed behind the net or to the middle, leaving the wall lane open. It is also the right call when F1 is arriving fast on the wrong side — pass before F1 can influence the lane. D2 typically makes this call, because D2 can see what D1 cannot.
• Execution: Pass firmly and to the winger's stick, not to the boards behind them — a rim to a stationary winger is a different play and a worse one. Head up first: aim the pass where the winger will be, not where they were.
• The risk: The wall pass travels the lane a forecheck posts its wall-sealer in — F2 in a 2-1-2, the strong-side half-wall player in a 1-2-2. Intercepted at the hash marks, it's a scoring chance from the top of the circle.
• How it's defeated: Any forecheck with a designated wall-sealer beats it — the second forechecker in a 2-1-2 whose job is exactly this, or the strong-side half-wall player in a 1-2-2. Teams also beat it by having their weak-side defenceman step down on the winger the instant the pass leaves, so the winger has no time even after a good pass.

---

Wheel

Action

The defenceman carries the puck himself, skating behind the net and up the far side

Position

D1 retrieves in one corner and keeps skating; D2 takes the net front early where that screen is legal, and the far-side winger and the centre become outlets

Read

You need two things — speed and space: a step on the first forechecker, and no second forechecker waiting on the far side

Technique

Cut tight to the net so the net itself screens you, and come out of the turn with your head up and speed already built

Risk

You carry the puck through the middle-ish of your own zone with your back briefly to the play; if you are caught, you are caught below your own goal line with the puck

Rule

Under the NHL and IIHF a partner standing at the net front is legal; sliding into the forechecker's path is an interference minor (NHL 56.2) — not capped: 56.4 a major on violence, 56.5 a game misconduct where that major injures, IIHF 56.5 a major plus game misconduct on reckless endangerment

Rule

USA Hockey splits from both — 625(a.1) makes "providing a protective screen and limiting the opportunity for an opposing player to apply pressure to a teammate in possession or control of the puck" a minor, and on a wheel your partner has the puck

Rule

USA Hockey writes no tier above 625's minor, but a slide into a forechecker delivered as a check leaves 625 for the boarding, charging, checking-from-behind, head-contact or roughing rules

Rule

USA Hockey's roughing tiers are 640(g), a major plus a game misconduct, and 640(h), a match — both reaching only acts under 640(b–f) — with 602(a)'s match penalty sitting outside 625 and 640 both

Rule

On a net-front pick the NHL is not the lenient book — NHL Rule 21.1 assesses a match penalty on a player who "deliberately attempts to injure or who deliberately injures an opponent in any manner", tied to no named foul, and Hockey Canada 8.3(c) writes that tier into the interference rule itself

Countered by

A second forechecker holding the far side — precisely what F2 does in a 2-1-2 — or a forechecker who takes the back-door route around the net rather than chasing you

The defenceman carries the puck himself, skating behind the net and up the far side.

• Setup: D1 retrieves in one corner and keeps skating around the back of the net. D2 takes up position in front of the net early — under the NHL and IIHF books; under USA Hockey that screen is itself a minor, and the split is set out in the execution note below — and the far-side winger and the centre become outlets.
• The read: You need two things: speed and space. Wheel when you have a step on the first forechecker and there is no second forechecker waiting on the far side. It's excellent against a slow or single-man forecheck, and against a forecheck that has just committed hard to one corner.
• Execution: Cut tight to the net — the net itself is your screen, and cutting wide gives the forechecker a straight line to intercept you. Come out of the turn with your head up and speed already built. Your partner, already standing at the net front, makes a cross-slot pursuit slower: the forechecker has to go around a player who is entitled to the ice he is on. That is legal under the NHL's book and the IIHF's — the one a British player is under — and it is the entitlement NHL and IIHF Rule 56.1 write down. ⚠️ It is not legal under USA Hockey's, and standing still is no defence there. USA Hockey 625(a.1) makes a minor of "[p]roviding a protective screen and limiting the opportunity for an opposing player to apply pressure to a teammate in possession or control of the puck" — which is this play named in the rulebook's own words, because on a wheel your partner is the teammate in possession. If you play in the United States, do not build a wheel around a net-front screen without asking your officials first; the split, and the fact that USA Hockey publishes no interpretation of that clause, are set out in full in section 2. Even under the NHL and IIHF the entitlement covers standing and nothing more: it does not make the pursuit illegal, and if your partner slides across into the forechecker's path to make it happen, that is an interference minor against your team (Rule 56.1 defines the pick; the minor itself is 56.2) — and not capped there: 56.4 allows a major on the degree of violence, and NHL 56.5 adds a game misconduct, though only "when a major penalty is imposed under this rule for an infraction resulting in an injury of an opponent". IIHF 56.5 reaches a major plus a game misconduct where it recklessly endangers, with nobody hurt, and Hockey Canada 8.3(b) reaches the same tier on "the degree of violence of the impact" with nobody hurt, and makes it mandatory where it injures, with 8.3(c) adding a match penalty for an attempt to injure by interference. ⚠️ And the NHL is not the lenient book on this play either, because the NHL's penalty ladder does not stop at Rule 56: NHL Rule 21.1 assesses a match penalty "on any player who deliberately attempts to injure or who deliberately injures an opponent in any manner", tied to no named foul and needing no injury for the attempt. ⚠️ And USA Hockey, the book you are under if you play in the United States, gets there by a different road: its Rule 625 writes no tier above the minor, but a slide into a forechecker delivered as a body check does not stay in 625 — the Declaration of Player Safety directs it to the boarding, charging, checking-from-behind, head-contact or roughing rules, where 640(g) is a major plus a game misconduct for recklessly endangering an opponent and 640(h) a match — both reaching only "actions falling under Rule 640(b, c, d, e or f)", not roughing at large — and 602(a) reaches a match penalty from outside both. Set out in full in section 2.
• The risk: You are carrying the puck through the middle-ish of your own zone with your back briefly to the play. If you're caught, you're caught below your own goal line with the puck.
• How it's defeated: A second forechecker holding the far side — precisely what F2 does in a 2-1-2 — turns a wheel into a trap. A forechecker who takes the "back door" route around the net rather than chasing you also kills it. The counter to being caught mid-wheel is the reverse, below.

---

Reverse

Action

Send the puck back against the flow of the forecheck, usually a hard backhand off the boards behind you

Position

Moving one direction with the puck — often mid-wheel or up the wall — with a forechecker chasing your hip and D2 or the centre arriving behind you

Read

The forechecker has over-committed and skated past you; their momentum is the whole play, because they cannot stop

Technique

Bank it off the boards firmly and low behind you — soft reverses die in the corner and become turnovers

Key

The receiving teammate must call for it — "reverse!" — because D1 is looking the wrong way

Risk

You are putting the puck into a space you cannot see, below your own goal line; if nobody is there, the opposition has it behind your net with your defence facing the wrong way

Countered by

A containing F1 who steers rather than chases and is never past you to begin with, or an aggressive F2 who reads the reverse and arrives in the vacated space

Key

A rim goes onward around the boards in the direction the puck was already travelling; a reverse goes back against it

Sending the puck back against the flow of the forecheck, usually a hard backhand off the boards behind you, to a teammate arriving in the space the forechecker just vacated.

• Setup: You are moving one direction with the puck — often mid-wheel or working up the wall — with a forechecker chasing your hip. D2 or the centre is arriving behind you.
• The read: Reverse beats a forechecker who has over-committed and skated past you. The whole play depends on their momentum: they cannot stop, so the puck goes where they've just been. As Defender puts it: rim to beat a forechecker who is sealing you against the boards; reverse to beat one who has over-committed. Reading which of the two you're facing is a core defenceman skill.
• Execution: Bank it off the boards firmly and low behind you. Soft reverses die in the corner and become turnovers. The receiving teammate must call for it — "reverse!" — because D1 is looking the wrong way.
• The risk: You are putting the puck into a space you cannot see, below your own goal line. If nobody is there, the opposition has the puck behind your net with your defence facing the wrong direction.
• How it's defeated: Disciplined forechecks defeat reverses by simply not over-committing — the containing F1 of a 1-2-2 steers rather than chases and is never past you to begin with. Aggressive forechecks defeat it with F2 reading the reverse and arriving in the vacated space instead of your teammate.

Rim and reverse are different plays. Keep them straight: a rim goes onward around the boards in the direction the puck was already travelling; a reverse goes back against it.

---

D-to-D

Action

Pass across to your partner, changing the side the attack comes from and forcing the entire forecheck to reset and shift

Position

D1 with the puck low on one side, D2 available low on the other

Read

Your side is flooded and the other is not — its real value is that it costs the opposition time, and everything they had covered comes uncovered while they travel

Never

Through the slot. Go behind your own net instead; intercepted below the goal line it means nothing, the same pass in front of the net is a point-blank chance against

Action

Pass it quickly rather than skating it across — carrying the puck toward your partner drags the pressure with you

Risk

Executed correctly, one of the lowest-risk plays in hockey; executed through the slot, one of the highest, with very little middle ground

Countered by

A 2-1-2 with two forecheckers arriving on separate sides, or a 1-2-2 whose F1 takes away the D-to-D lane as their first responsibility

The pass across to your partner, changing the side of the ice the attack comes from and forcing the entire forecheck to reset and shift.

• Setup: D1 has the puck low on one side; D2 is available low on the other.
• The read: Use it when your side is flooded and the other is not. Its real value is that it costs the opposition time: a forecheck built to pressure one side has to travel across the ice, and everything they had covered comes uncovered while they do.
• Execution — and the rule that does not bend: Never through the slot. Go behind your own net. ⚠️ "Behind the net" is the default, not the only route — some teams instead exchange high in the zone, above the tops of the circles, reasoning that an interception there is not a slot chance. That is a coaching convention and nothing in the rulebook touches it (Risk Management labels it as one). Ask which your team plays. What does not vary is the slot itself. A D-to-D pass below the goal line that gets intercepted means nothing — the puck is behind the net with no shot available. The same pass in front of the net that gets intercepted is a point-blank chance against, and it is one of the most punished mistakes in the game — coaching emphasis, not a counted ranking. Pass it quickly rather than skating it across; carrying the puck toward your partner just drags the pressure with you and hands them your problem.
• The risk: Executed correctly, this is one of the lowest-risk plays in hockey. Executed through the slot, it is one of the highest. There is very little middle ground.
• How it's defeated: A 2-1-2 with two forecheckers arriving on separate sides beats D-to-D because there's already someone on your partner. A 1-2-2 defeats it by having F1 take away the D-to-D lane as their first responsibility — that is often exactly what the containing forechecker is told to do — forcing the puck up the wall into the two waiting forwards.

---

Rim

Action

A hard shot along the boards that follows the curve of the rink around to a teammate further along — usually the far-side winger

Position

D1 in the corner or behind the net under real pressure, with a winger positioned around the boards to collect it

Read

A forechecker has sealed you against the boards and there is no passing lane through them; it is also the standard release valve when you simply have no time

Technique

Height and pace — low and flat enough to stay on the boards, hard enough to carry all the way around; a soft rim dies in the corner. Aim it where a teammate can meet it, not simply "around"

Risk

A rim concedes possession more often than any other option except an outright clear — a 50-50 dressed as a play; that full ranking is coaching judgement rather than a tracked rate

Key

One tracking study compares rim against a direct up pass by name and finds rims less efficient — 38% neutral-zone possession against 53%, 0.54 expected goals against 0.68, per 100 possessions

Key

Carry its limits — KHL data, successful passes only, and one column runs the other way: rims produced slightly fewer dump-outs than ups, 14.4 per 100 possessions against 15.6

Countered by

The play a defenceman sealed on the boards is most expected to make — coaching emphasis, not a counted ranking; any forecheck can post a player at the far wall, and good ones pre-position

A hard shot along the boards that follows the curve of the rink around to a teammate further along — usually the far-side winger.

• Setup: D1 has the puck in the corner or behind the net under real pressure. A winger is positioned around the boards to collect it.
• The read: Rim when a forechecker has sealed you against the boards and there is no passing lane through them. It is also the standard release valve when you simply have no time.
• Execution: Two things decide whether a rim works. Height and pace: keep it low and flat enough to stay on the boards and hard enough to carry all the way around — a soft rim dies in the corner and is a gift. Target: aim it to arrive where a teammate can meet it, not simply "around". See the trapezoid section (10) — this changes rim targeting fundamentally.
• The risk: A rim concedes possession more often than any other option except an outright clear, because the receiver is collecting a moving puck on the wall with a defenceman closing. That full ranking is a coaching judgement, not a tracked rate — the exit tracking in section 1 measures controlled exits against clears, and nothing found here ranks all nine options against one another. Two of them have been compared by name, though, and the data is KHL rather than NHL: Daniel Weinberger's pass-clustering work on Hockey Graphs sets rims against direct "up" passes — 9,298 possessions against 12,180 — and reports, per 100 possessions, that rims led to possession in the neutral zone 38% of the time against 53% for ups, produced 13.1 shots against 17.4, and 0.54 expected goals against 0.68. His summary: "Rims are a lot less efficient." ⚠️ Carry two limits with it. It counts successful passes only — he says in terms that "any analysis that only focuses on successful events is inherently flawed" — so his explanation that "rims are much more likely to result in a turnover" is his reasoning rather than his measurement. And one column runs the other way: rims produced slightly fewer dump-outs per 100 possessions than ups, 14.4 against 15.6. It's a 50-50 dressed as a play.
• How it's defeated: The rim is the play a forecheck most expects from a defenceman sealed on the boards — coaching emphasis, not a counted ranking. Any forecheck can post a player at the far wall to intercept it, and most do — the weak-side defenceman stepping down to the far wall to kill rims is standard. Skilled teams beat rims without even moving: they read the pressure you're under and pre-position.

---

Over / cross-ice

Never

Use "over" without agreeing which sense — Sense A is this cross-ice pass, the highest-risk option here; Sense B is the D-to-D behind your own net, one of the lowest-risk

Action

Pass from the puck-carrying defenceman across the width of the ice to the far winger, skipping the strong-side structure entirely

Position

D1 with the puck usually a little higher than the goal line; the far-side winger or the weak-side defenceman open across the ice

Read

Only when the forecheck has genuinely over-loaded one side and the middle is empty

Technique

Firm and flat — a cross-ice pass that has to be handled at the receiver's feet has taken so long that the play is over

Risk

The puck travels laterally in front of your own net at the height of the opposing forwards — intercepted, it is picked off in the middle facing your goal

Priority

Where the behind-the-net D-to-D route exists, take it instead — it achieves a similar side-switch with essentially no downside

Countered by

Any forecheck with a middle presence — the three-across middle of a 1-3-1, F3 in a 2-1-2 — and it is defeated by the shape existing at all, not by anyone reacting to it

Read this naming warning first. The word "over" is used for two completely different plays with completely different risk profiles:

• Sense A — cross-ice "over": a pass across the width of the ice to the far winger, in front of your own net. This is the play described in this section, and it is the highest-risk of the nine breakout options.
• Sense B — D-to-D "over": the pass behind your own net to your partner. Many playbooks and most goalie call vocabularies use "over" to mean this, and it is one of the lowest-risk plays in hockey.

Find out which one your team means before you use the word, because the two carry opposite instructions. This document labels the sense every time it uses the word: the option below is Sense A; the goalie's call list in section 9 is Sense B.

The cross-ice over is a pass from the puck-carrying defenceman across the width of the ice to the far winger or far side, skipping the strong-side structure entirely.

• Setup: D1 has the puck, usually a little higher than the goal line. The far-side winger or the weak-side defenceman is open across the ice.
• The read: Only when the forecheck has genuinely over-loaded one side and the middle is empty. The reward is real — one pass and you've beaten three forecheckers, arriving with the far winger already in stride.
• Execution: Firm and flat. A cross-ice pass that has to be handled at the receiver's feet has taken so long that the play is over.
• The risk — and why this is the highest-risk of the nine breakout options: the puck travels laterally across the width of the ice, in front of your own net, at the height where the opposing forwards are. If it's intercepted, the interception happens in the middle of the ice facing your goal, with your defence flat-footed and out of position. Compare it to the D-to-D behind the net, which achieves a similar side-switch with essentially no downside. Where the behind-the-net route exists, take it instead.
• How it's defeated: Any forecheck with a middle presence — the three-across middle of a 1-3-1, F3 in a 2-1-2 — is standing in this lane by design. It is defeated not by reacting to it but by the shape existing at all.

---

Quick-up / counter

Action

The immediate transition off a turnover, before the forecheck has any chance to set up

Position

Your team has just won the puck — a blocked shot, a stripped puck at the blue line, a rebound — and the opposition still has bodies below the puck

Read

Not really a called play but a recognised moment — the two or three seconds immediately after a turnover are the least organised the opposition will ever be

Technique

First look up ice, not down. Move the puck on the first touch if you can — speed of decision matters more than quality of pass here

Risk

The habit version is the real risk — playing quick-up when the moment isn't there, forcing a pass into a formed defence

Countered by

Counter-pressing — teams that re-attack the puck within a couple of seconds of losing it shorten the fuse rather than removing the play

The immediate transition off a turnover, before the forecheck has any chance to set up.

• Setup: Your team has just won the puck — a blocked shot, a stripped puck at the blue line, a rebound your goalie has left. The opposition still has bodies below the puck and their structure is nowhere.
• The read: This isn't really a called play; it's a recognised moment. The two or three seconds immediately after a turnover are the least organised the opposition will ever be. If a teammate is available up the ice, that is the moment to move it — before your own structure has formed, before theirs has re-formed.
• Execution: First look up ice, not down. Move the puck on the first touch if you can. Speed of decision matters more than quality of pass here; a five-second wait to make a perfect play has given away the entire advantage.
• The risk: The lowest-risk high-reward play available — the opposition has fewer defenders back and less shape than at any other time. The real risk is the habit version: playing quick-up when the moment isn't there, forcing a pass into a formed defence.
• How it's defeated: Counter-pressing. Teams that immediately re-attack the puck within a couple of seconds of losing it are specifically trying to remove your quick-up window. Against those teams the quick-up is still available — it just has a shorter fuse.

---

Stretch pass

Action

A long pass from your defensive zone to a forward who has left early and is waiting up ice

Position

One forward — usually the weak-side winger — leaves the defensive zone early and stretches high; the retrieving defenceman looks up and hits them

Read

The opposition has committed all three forwards deep on the forecheck and their defencemen have stepped up — that shape leaves a lane and leaves your winger behind coverage

Technique

Head up before you handle the puck, and lead the receiver so they collect it in stride

Rule

NHL Rule 83.1 and IIHF Rule 83.1 are materially identical, differing in pronoun — one skate in contact with the blue line, or behind it, keeps your winger onside, and a skate in the air over the neutral zone still counts, because the plane has not been broken

Rule

The airborne skate is the NHL and IIHF position, so it is the British one; under USA Hockey 630(a), the skate must have contact with the neutral zone or the blue line, and Hockey Canada 6.11 counts only skates in contact with the ice, so in two books of the four an airborne skate is offside

Rule

No centre-red-line ("two-line") pass restriction appears in the NHL, IIHF, USA Hockey or Hockey Canada books, and CARHA Rule 73(d) abolishes it in terms — so in all five of those books the long pass is legal

Never

Rebuild your attack around a local two-line pass rule unless somebody shows it to you in writing — no published rulebook held here confirms that any league still runs one

Risk

An intercepted stretch is a full-speed rush the other way with your winger a full zone out of the play — genuinely high-risk/high-reward, and in most amateur hockey not a good default

Countered by

A 1-3-1, which exists to kill it; a conservative 1-2-2 with two forwards holding high; or defencemen simply backing off rather than stepping up

A long pass from your defensive zone to a forward who has left early and is waiting up ice, typically near the neutral zone or the far blue line.

• Setup: One forward — usually the weak-side winger — leaves the defensive zone early and stretches high. The retrieving defenceman looks up and hits them.
• The read: Take the stretch when the opposition has committed all three forwards deep on the forecheck and their defencemen have stepped up. That is the shape that leaves a lane and leaves your winger behind coverage.
• Execution: Head up before you handle the puck, and lead the receiver so they collect it in stride. Your winger must stay onside at the far blue line, and the rule is worth stating the right way round. Rule 83.1: "A player is on-side when either of his skates are in contact with the blue line, or on his own side of the line, at the instant the puck completely crosses the leading edge of the blue line." So one skate touching the line, or behind it, keeps your winger onside. They are only offside if both skates are completely over the leading edge before the puck completely crosses it. Read plainly: the puck goes first, or at worst you and the puck arrive together — and a skate in the air over the neutral zone still counts as onside, because the plane has not been broken. The IIHF's Rule 83.1 says this in materially identical words — it writes "either of their skates" and "their 'own side'" where the NHL writes "his" — down to the "plane" of the blue line extending upwards and the skate that "has yet to break the plane" — so if you play anywhere in Britain, the airborne trail skate is legal in your book too. Under USA Hockey 630(a) and Hockey Canada 6.11 it is not, though they get there by different words: USA Hockey requires contact with the neutral zone or the blue line, and Hockey Canada counts only skates "in physical contact with the ice surface". Either way an airborne skate is offside. Neither the NHL nor the IIHF rulebook contains a centre-red-line ("two-line") pass restriction — the long pass is legal, and it is absent from USA Hockey's and Hockey Canada's books too. That now includes the rec level: the CARHA Hockey Official Rule Book, the standalone book a large number of Canadian adult leagues play under, abolishes it in as many words at Rule 73(d) — "For the purpose of 2-line passes, the red line will not be in play. It will still be in effect for icing." ⚠️ Flagged as unverified: it is often said that a few older recreational-association rulebooks still run a two-line pass rule locally, but there is no published rulebook held here to confirm it. So do not rebuild your attack around one unless somebody shows it to you in writing. Neutral Zone Systems carries the same flag.
• The risk profile — the honest version: a completed stretch pass is close to a breakaway. An intercepted one is a full-speed rush the other way with your winger a full zone out of the play — call it sixty to eighty feet behind the puck — because they left before the exit was secure. This is genuinely a high-risk/high-reward play, and its expected value depends almost entirely on your league's ability to complete a pass of that length: the blue lines sit 64 feet out from each goal line (Rule 1.5) and the rink is 200 feet long (Rule 1.2 — Dimensions; note that 1.5 covers the lines and 1.6 only names the three zones), so from your own goal line to the far blue line is 114 feet, and even a stretch to the centre red line is 89 feet. Very few amateur players can put a flat, receivable pass through either. In most amateur hockey it is not a good default. Those are NHL-sheet distances. The IIHF book specifies a different sheet, and the current In-House Rules authorise rinks smaller again "for all levels of hockey", in "all fixtures", right across the Home Countries — "England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland"; UK and England Rules has the amendment and Rink Map and Glossary covers the dimensions. Pace the pass to the sheet you are standing on.
• How it's defeated: A 1-3-1 exists to kill it — three players stretched across the neutral zone erase the lane. A conservative 1-2-2 with two forwards holding high does much the same. Teams also defeat it simply by having their defencemen back off rather than step up, which makes the receiving winger easy to cover.

---

Off the glass and out

Read

When the alternatives are a turnover in a dangerous area or a play you are not confident in — and when you desperately need a change

Technique

Aim high off the glass in the corner or up the wall, not flat up the middle; a flat clear up the middle is both the classic interception and the classic icing

Rule

Hybrid icing turns on "which player would first touch the puck, not which player would first reach the end zone face-off dots" (NHL Rule 81.1; IIHF Rule 81.1 materially identical) — the dot is the deadline, and a race too close to call by then goes to icing

Rule

After your own icing your line cannot change (NHL and IIHF Rule 81.4) and cannot take a time-out (Rule 87.1: "No time-out shall be granted to the defensive team following an icing…") — 81.4's exceptions are an injury, a strength-changing penalty, and a pulled goalkeeper, never a tired line

Rule

IIHF 87.1 matches the NHL on icing; IIHF 81.4 adds one substitution exception ("a Player with a broken skate") its own 82.1 omits, and a change refused on it is a warning or a bench minor if your bench has had one (82.2(V)); both bans bind you in Britain, USA Hockey imposes neither (624, 636(f))

Rule

Shorthanded you may ice it freely (NHL Rule 81.6), subject to two carve-outs — a major with an empty penalty bench, and USA Hockey's classification limit — both set out in Special Teams and Rules Primer; IIHF 81.6 carries neither

Rule

Putting the puck directly out of play from your defending zone is a two-minute delay-of-game minor (NHL 63.2(iii), IIHF 63.2(III)); carve-outs are boards with no glass, a puck off a faceoff, one straight into the bench — the NHL penalises glass "behind" the bench, the IIHF "surrounding" it, wider

Rule

USA Hockey writes no such minor for putting the puck out of play — Rule 610(c) penalises only a deliberate shoot-out, and 631(d) makes an accidental one a last-play faceoff; Hockey Canada 10.1(ii) is deliberate-only too, its direct limb 10.1(v) naming the goaltender alone

Key

A clear that hits the glass and stays in the rink is fine, and so is a puck deflected out of play

Key

Glass clears rarely get intercepted and rarely ice, because they slow the puck and keep it wide — which is why the play is called "off the glass", not "over the glass"

Countered by

A defenceman holding the offensive blue line and stopping the puck getting out — a different play from a pinch, which is stepping down from the line into the zone

No possession, no goal against. Always available and never wrong when you're in trouble.

• Setup: You have the puck, you have pressure, and you have no play.
• The read: When the alternatives are a turnover in a dangerous area or a play you're not confident in. It is also the correct play when you desperately need a change.
• Execution: Aim high off the glass in the corner or up the wall, not flat up the middle. Glass clears rarely get intercepted and rarely ice, because they slow the puck and keep it wide. A flat clear up the middle is both the classic interception and the classic icing.
• Two rules you must know:
  • Icing — and it is hybrid icing, which is not quite what most players think. If you are at even strength or up a skater, and you shoot the puck from your own half of the ice (the centre red line divides the halves, Rule 81.1) across the far goal line, the linespersons do not wait for anyone to touch it. The race is to the puck, and the end-zone faceoff dot is only the deadline for the decision: Rule 81.1 states that "the determining factor is which player would first touch the puck, not which player would first reach the end zone face-off dots", and the call is made no later than the instant the first player's skate reaches that dot. If it is too close to call by then, icing is called. So a clear from your own blue line with a defender two strides ahead of your winger is icing whether or not the puck is ever touched. Play stops, the faceoff comes back to your zone, and your line cannot change (Rule 81.4 — whose only exceptions are a substitution for an injured player, one made when a penalty has changed the on-ice strength, and one to replace a goalkeeper who had been pulled for an extra attacker; a tired line is not among them) and cannot take a timeout (Rule 87.1: "No time-out shall be granted to the defensive team following an icing…") — that last part is the real cost, because the tired players who just iced it are stuck out there for a defensive-zone draw. All of that holds under the IIHF book, and therefore in Britain: IIHF Rule 81.1 carries the same "which Player would first touch the puck, not which Player would first reach the end zone 'face-off' dots" sentence and the same "too close to determine… 'icing' shall be called" instruction, IIHF 81.4 bans the substitution, and IIHF 87.1 says in terms "No 'time-out' shall be granted to the defensive team following an icing…". Do not expect your own book to punish an icing more lightly. IIHF 81.4 does list one exception the NHL's does not — you may substitute for "a Player with a broken skate" — ⚠️ but the same book's 82.1 states the identical ban for an icing and omits it, and neither rule says which governs. Try the change and be refused and IIHF 82.2(V) has the Referee send those players back to the bench and warn the team through its Coach that "any subsequent violations during the rest of the game (including overtime), shall result in a bench minor penalty" for delaying the game — one warning per team per game, so a bench that has already had one takes the penalty at once. The IIHF's 81.1 is materially identical to the NHL's rather than word-for-word, and it is the longer of the two: it adds a sentence the NHL's book has no equivalent of — "If there is no 'race' for the puck, icing should not be called until a defending skater crosses its defending blue line and the puck crosses the goal line (not between the goal posts)." So where nobody is chasing, the IIHF book defers the call until a defender has come back for it. Shorthanded, you can ice it freely (Rule 81.6) — subject to two carve-outs set out in Special Teams and Rules Primer: a team shorthanded by a major that has left nobody on the penalty bench loses the exemption, and USA Hockey only grants it from Youth 15-Only / Girls 16U / High School / Adult upward. Neither carve-out is in the IIHF's 81.6 — see UK and England Rules. Note the two halves detail: a clear released from their side of centre can never be icing no matter how far it travels.
  • Over the glass is a penalty. Under NHL Rule 63.2(iii), shooting or batting the puck directly (non-deflected) out of the playing surface from your defending zone is a two-minute minor for delay of game. Off the glass and staying in is fine; a deflection out is fine; a clean flip over the glass from your own end is a penalty. The rule's own exceptions: it does not apply "where there is no glass", it does not apply to a puck shot into the players' bench (though over the glass behind the bench does count), and no penalty is assessed when the puck leaves the playing area directly off a faceoff. This is why the play is called "off the glass", not "over the glass". ⚠️ 🇬🇧 And this one is not the NHL's alone — the IIHF writes the same provision in words of its own, so it is the rule a British player is actually under. IIHF Rule 63.2(III) assesses the minor "on any Player who shoots or bats (using their hand or stick) the puck directly (non-deflected) out of the playing surface from their defending zone, except where there is no protective glass", with the same determining factor and the same two Note carve-outs, unchanged between the 2025/26 and 2026/27 editions. The two limbs are materially the same rule, and they are not word for word — the difference runs against you: where the NHL penalises a puck "shot over the glass 'behind' the players' bench", the IIHF penalises one "shot over the protective glass surrounding the Players' bench" — a wider word, which appears to reach the glass at the sides of the bench as well. The other two books do not write this limb at all: USA Hockey 610(c) reaches only a deliberate shoot-out, with 631(d) sending an accidental one to a last-play faceoff, and Hockey Canada 10.1(ii) likewise reaches only a puck "deliberately" shot, batted or thrown out. ⚠️ Do not read that limb as skaters-only, though. It says "a player", and Hockey Canada's Glossary provides that "the goaltender is considered a player, except where explicitly stated because special rules or privileges apply to them" — the same page showing what an express exclusion looks like, at "POSSESSION: The state of a player, except the goaltender". Rule 10.1 names a goaltender at 10.1(v), at 10.1(vi) and in its unnumbered Players' Bench paragraph — and not at 10.1(ii). Its direct limb that writes no deliberateness word, 10.1(v), is confined to "a goaltender who shoots or bats the puck directly out of the playing surface, with their stick" — so a goalie who deliberately glove-throws the puck out is caught by Rule 10.1(ii) rather than Rule 10.1(v). That a glove-thrown puck falls under Hockey Canada's 10.1(ii) rather than 10.1(v) is this guide's reading of the text, not a ruling the book has published: Rule 10.1(a)'s twelve Interpretations do not address it, and Interpretation 5 — the one about goaltenders putting the puck out — carves out only the no-glass, glass-touch and deflection cases. ⚠️ And do not read the bench as a target. The IIHF Situation Handbook — Situation 63.24, put in the same words in the 2025/26 (v1.1) and 2026/27 editions — puts a clear that goes over the glass and lands in the Players' Bench, and still calls the minor: "the determining factor… is where the puck leaves the playing surface", judged on "an imaginary plane that continues upwards to the roof from the top of the glass", and only a puck "shot directly into the Players' Bench (where there is no glass)" escapes. Its Foreword ranks it below the book — "in case of any contradictions, the valid IIHF Rulebook is always the basis" — so that is how it is officiated rather than the rule itself. Risk Management carries all four books in full.
• How it's defeated: By a defenceman holding the offensive blue line — staying at the line and stopping the puck getting out. That is a different play from a pinch, which is stepping down from the line into the zone to attack a puck below you. Holding beats a glass clear; pinching beats a puck already dying in the corner, and costs far more when it misses. Your own defencemen face the same choice at the other end — see Defender.

---

4. Winger Timing and Positioning on the Wall

This is one of the most common amateur failures in hockey — coaching emphasis rather than a counted ranking — and it is not a skill problem.

The failure

Never

Stand still, flat against the boards at the hash marks, waiting

Risk

You are uncoverable but useless — your check cannot take the puck off you before you have it, so it feels like you are doing your job

Risk

You have no speed — the pass arrives and you start from zero with a defenceman closing at speed

Risk

You have nowhere to go — pinned flat against the wall, your only escape routes are along the boards, the exact lane the opposition is defending

Key

A moving target with an opening lane is far easier to hit than a still one in a closed one

You stand still, flat against the boards, at the hash marks, waiting. And here's the thing — you are technically uncoverable there. Your check can't really take the puck off you before you have it, and you feel available. So it feels like you're doing your job.

You are not. You are uncoverable but useless, for three connected reasons:

1. You have no speed. The pass arrives and you're starting from zero, with a defenceman closing at speed. You will lose that race every time.
2. You have nowhere to go. Pinned flat against the wall, your only escape routes are along the boards — the exact lane the opposition is defending.
3. You are not actually available. Standing still against the boards means the passer has to hit a stationary target in a lane an opponent can simply stand in. A moving target with an opening lane is far easier to hit than a still one in a closed one.

Where to stand

Position

On the wall, between the hash marks and the goal line, on the strong side — low enough that the pass is short and safe, high enough that you are moving up ice when you get it

Key

This is where you arrive, not where you have been standing

Action

Under the house-default low zone collapse you spend the defensive shift high, level with the opposing point man, and come down the wall to this spot as your team wins the puck

Never

Sit above the hash marks once the breakout is under way — it makes the pass longer, flatter and more interceptable, and the pass comes into your back

Key

Being high before that, while they still have possession, is not an error at all — the error is failing to make the trip, not starting from the top

Convention

Wall position is system-dependent — a flat/spread structure asks wingers to hold higher toward the blue line, and a stretch or flying-winger structure sends one winger up ice entirely

The default landmark is on the wall, between the hash marks and the goal line, on the strong side — low enough that the pass from behind or beside the net is short and safe, high enough that you're moving up ice when you get it.

This is where you arrive, not where you have been standing. Under the house-default low zone collapse you spend the defensive shift high, level with the opposing point man on your side, and you come down the wall to this spot as your team wins the puck — the one time in that system a winger leaves the point voluntarily. See Defensive Zone Coverage and Winger. Read anything below about "where the strong-side winger stands" as where the strong-side winger stands once the breakout has started.

Being above the hash marks once the breakout is under way is the more common error: it makes the pass longer, flatter and more interceptable, and it means the pass comes into your back. Being high before that, while they still have possession, is not an error at all — it is your coverage. The error is failing to make the trip, not starting from the top.

When to move

Mindset

Time your arrival, don't camp — better a little late than a little early, because it is easy to speed up and very hard to slow down and re-accelerate

Read

If the puck is contested, come back for it — shorten the pass and skate toward the puck to receive

Read

If the puck is clean, stay in stride — take a small route away from the puck, then arrive back into the lane with speed

Action

Either way, keep your feet moving; the player standing still is the player who gets hit

Time your arrival, don't camp. The principle borrowed from centre-support coaching applies just as hard to wingers: it is better to be a little late than a little early, because it is easy to speed up and very hard to slow down and re-accelerate.

• Come back for it if the puck is contested. If your defenceman is in a battle or under real pressure, shorten the pass. Skate toward the puck to receive. A short pass to a supporting winger beats a long pass to a distant one every time.
• Stay in stride if the puck is clean. If your defenceman has the puck and time, don't stop and wait. Take a small route away from the puck instead and then arrive back into the lane with speed, so you receive the pass already moving up ice. This is what "timing" means in practice.
• Either way, feet moving. Even a small shuffle keeps you able to react. The player standing still is the player who gets hit.

Presenting a target, and receiving open to the ice

Technique

Stick on the ice, blade flat, angled toward the passer — your blade is the target, so put it where you want the puck

Action

Check your shoulder before the puck arrives, so you already know whether you are skating, passing or eating it

Never

Receive the puck with your chest to the boards — facing the glass you have surrendered every option except a blind chip

Technique

Open your hips to the ice and take a step or two off the boards, so you can skate, pass to the centre, pass back to your defenceman or attack the middle

Technique

If the puck arrives hard on the boards, angle a skate to kill it off the wall onto your stick rather than reaching and missing

Never

Shield with your back to the boards, or duck. Get your skates parallel to the boards instead, forearm and hip to the wall, head up and chin off your chest

Convention

Whether you also call for it is a team preference — some prefer silence on the wall to avoid tipping the play; the stick is not optional

Stick on the ice, blade flat, angled toward the passer — not held up, not dragging behind you. Your blade is the target; put it where you want the puck. Whether you also call for it is a team preference (some prefer silence on the wall to avoid tipping the play — see On-Ice Communication); the stick is not optional. And check your shoulder before the puck arrives, so you already know whether you are skating, passing or eating it.

Do not receive the puck with your chest to the boards. This is the technical heart of the whole job.

• Open your hips to the ice as the puck arrives, so you can see the full rink and the puck at once. Facing the glass, you have surrendered every option except a blind chip.
• Get separation from the wall. A step or two off the boards means you can skate, pass to the centre, pass back to your defenceman or attack the middle. Flush against the wall you can do one of those.
• Use your skates when you must — if the puck arrives hard on the boards, angle a skate to kill it off the wall onto your stick rather than reaching and missing.
• Protect it if you have to. With a defenceman on your back and no option, "eat it" — shield the puck with your body until support arrives — or chip it off the glass. Both beat a blind turnover. Safety override: shield with your skates parallel to the boards and your forearm and hip to the wall, head up and chin off your chest — never with your back to the boards, and never duck. Puck protection never justifies that orientation; see Body Contact and Battles → Receiving a Hit Safely, which covers it.

The winger's four options — and the order is a coaching choice

Options

Four things you can do — skate up ice, pass to the centre, pass back to your defenceman, or eat it / chip it out

Convention

Which comes first is a system decision, not a law, and the two common answers point in opposite directions

Convention

Skate-first — taught to young wingers who freeze on the wall, and the safer default when your team's passing is unreliable

Convention

Pass-first (quick-up) — what a quick-transition team wants: first look up ice before your feet commit, and skating is what you do when the look is not there

Action

Find out which one your coach wants

Key

Both versions agree on one thing — check your shoulder before the puck arrives; a winger who scans after receiving is left with whichever option has not closed

Once you have it you have four things you can do: skate (feet moving up ice, away from your own net), pass to the centre (they should be low and close, at or below your height), pass back to your defenceman (if the pressure came from above), and eat it or chip it out (last resort, and never a failure).

Which comes first is a system decision, not a law, and the two common answers point in opposite directions.

• Skate-first is the version taught to young wingers who freeze on the wall, and the safer default when your team's passing is unreliable — a winger moving up ice with the puck cannot throw it away.
• Pass-first (quick-up) is what a quick-transition team wants: first look up ice before your feet commit, on the reasoning that the two seconds after a retrieval are the least organised the opposition will ever be. This document's own "Quick-up / counter" option and its reading-pressure section lean that way, and Winger states it flatly — your first look is always up ice. Under this version, skating is what you do when the look is not there.

Find out which one your coach wants. Both versions agree on one thing: check your shoulder before the puck arrives, so you already know which of the four you are choosing. A winger who scans after receiving is left with whichever option has not closed.

---

5. The Centre's Swing

If the winger's job is the most botched, the centre's is the most misunderstood of the three forward jobs — and it does more damage when it goes wrong, because the centre being in the wrong place removes the option the whole structure relies on.

The swing, and where exactly it goes

Goal

A low support loop — swing back down into your own zone, stay beneath the puck, and offer a short, safe, middle-lane pass

Position

Inside the faceoff dots and below the hash marks — the strong-side circle, not the wall

Key

Below the hash marks the lane is open and the pass is short, and you receive facing up ice; above them you are level with their forwards and the puck arrives into your back

Never

Drift wide out to the boards — that is the strong-side winger's ice, one opponent then covers you both, and it kills the middle-lane option the structure depends on

Key

If you can touch the glass, you are in the wrong job

Key

You are the bail-out — when the wall is sealed and the wheel is closed, the low centre is what keeps the breakout alive

Your job on a breakout is a low support loop: you swing back down into your own zone, staying beneath the puck, and offer a short, safe, middle-lane pass. You come low, curl, and leave with speed as the play exits.

Where exactly: inside the faceoff dots and below the hash marks — the strong-side circle, not the wall. Two boundaries, for two different reasons:

• Below the hash marks. Above them you are level with the opposition's forwards and the passing lane closes; below them the lane is open and the pass is short. Short passes complete and long ones do not — a centre ten feet from the defenceman is a pass that always works, one forty feet away is a hope. Coming from below and beside, you also receive facing up ice; coming from above, the puck arrives into your back.
• Inside the dots, not out on the boards. Drifting wide puts you in the strong-side winger's ice, where one opposing player covers you both, and it kills the middle-lane option the structure depends on. Your swing may arc toward the strong side — it should, that is how you gather speed — but it arcs into the circle. If you can touch the glass, you are in the wrong job.

You are the bail-out: when the wall is sealed and the wheel is closed, the low centre is what keeps the breakout alive. Without you, your defenceman is down to a rim, a reverse to nobody, or a turnover.

How a high centre kills the breakout

Never

Leave early anticipating the rush and end up high in the zone or already in the neutral zone

Risk

The defenceman is down to two options — the wall or a clear — and the opposition knows it

Risk

The pass angle is wrong even if it is attempted, because it has to travel up through the middle of your own zone

Risk

You receive with your back to the play, and every option you gave the play was a decoy, so the forecheck can commit to the wall and the wheel at 100%

Mindset

Better a little late than a little early — late, you accelerate into the puck; early, you have to stop and restart, and you have already killed the play

The common amateur failure: the centre leaves early, anticipating the rush, and ends up high in the zone or already in the neutral zone. The cost is fourfold. The defenceman is down to two options — the wall or a clear — and the opposition knows it. The pass angle is wrong even if it is attempted, because it now has to travel up through the middle of your own zone, the one place you never want a puck lost. You receive with your back to the play, if you receive it at all. And every option you gave the play was a decoy, so the forecheck can commit to the wall and the wheel at 100%.

How often it happens is not measured. The coaching pages that name this error describe the mechanism and put no rate on it, so treat "most young centres do this" as an impression rather than a figure. The correction is the wingers': better a little late than a little early. Late, you accelerate into the puck. Early, you have to stop and restart, and you have already killed the play.

Timing the exit

Goal

The point of swinging low is not just to be a target — it is to leave with speed

Technique

Take a route that has you moving away from the puck briefly, then turning back into it, so you are already at pace as you cross your own blue line

Risk

A centre who receives a pass standing still has technically executed the play and gained nothing

Convention

Centre-low is a coaching choice — the alternative is the centre fly, and both are legitimate

Never

Fly in a flat/spread system where the wingers hold high near the blue line — then nobody has low support at all

The point of swinging low is not just to be a target — it's to leave with speed. Take a route that has you moving away from the puck briefly, then turning back into it, so that when you receive it or when the play goes up the wall, you're already at pace as you cross your own blue line. A centre who receives a pass standing still has technically executed the play and gained nothing.

---

6. Breaking Out Against Each Forecheck

The correct breakout is not chosen from a list of favourites; it's chosen by reading the shape in front of you. What each of these forechecks actually is, and how it is coached, belongs to Forechecking Systems — one line each here, then straight to how you beat it.

Against a 1-2-2

Read

F1 pressures and steers rather than attacks, two forwards hold the middle-and-wall band behind, two defencemen hold the line — containment, not chaos

Key

It takes away the middle, and usually the D-to-D lane; the two F2/F3 forwards sit exactly where a wall pass wants to go

Mindset

You will usually have time — use it; this is the forecheck that punishes rushed decisions most and pressured decisions least

Action

Make F1 commit with a wheel, or simply by skating at F1 — once they pick a side, the other side is genuinely open

Key

The low centre is your key, because the 1-2-2's two middle forwards are positioned relatively high and the space beneath them is real

Never

Rim into a set 1-2-2 — it hands the puck to two waiting forwards. Beat it with numbers up the middle instead

Action

Against the extreme version, the 1-2-2 trap, take controlled possession and patience, including regrouping in your own zone rather than skating into the wall of players

One line: F1 pressures, two forwards hold the middle-and-wall band behind, two defencemen hold the line. Containment, not chaos — F1 steers rather than attacks.

What it takes away: the middle, and usually the D-to-D lane, which F1 is often specifically tasked with closing. The two F2/F3 forwards sit exactly where a wall pass wants to go.

How to break it:

• You will usually have time. Use it. Take the extra second to look — this is the forecheck that punishes rushed decisions most and pressured decisions least.
• Make F1 commit. A wheel, or simply skating at F1, forces the containing forechecker to pick a side. Once they pick, the other side is genuinely open.
• The low centre is your key. The 1-2-2's two middle forwards are positioned relatively high; the space beneath them is real.
• Beat it with numbers up the middle, not with a rim. Rimming into a set 1-2-2 hands the puck to two waiting forwards.
• Against the extreme version (the 1-2-2 trap), the answer is usually controlled possession, patience, and forcing them to come to you — including regrouping in your own zone rather than skating into the wall of players. See Neutral Zone Systems.

Against a 2-1-2

Read

Two forwards pressure deep taking a side each, one supports in the middle, two defencemen hold — the most aggressive standard forecheck, and the house default throughout

Key

It takes away time, and both corners

Action

Play fast and simple — you do not have time to be clever, and the rushed cross-ice pass here is exactly the goal-against this forecheck is designed to produce

Key

Reverse and rim come into their own, because two forwards attacking deep are two forwards with momentum, and momentum is what the reverse punishes

Risk

The wheel is dangerous here — there is a second forechecker on the far side by design

Action

Beat them behind their pressure — when both their forwards are below your goal line, F3 is alone in the middle and their defencemen are exposed

Options

Glass and out is a legitimate answer — against sustained hard forechecking, refusing to turn the puck over in front of your own net is itself a strategy

One line: two forwards pressure deep taking a side each, one supports in the middle, two defencemen hold. The most aggressive standard forecheck, and the house default throughout.

What it takes away: time, and both corners.

How to break it:

• Play fast and simple. You do not have time to be clever. The rushed cross-ice pass here is exactly the goal-against this forecheck is designed to produce.
• Reverse and rim come into their own. Two forwards attacking deep are two forwards with momentum, and momentum is what the reverse punishes.
• The wheel is dangerous — there is a second forechecker on the far side by design.
• Beat them behind their pressure. When both their forwards are below your goal line, F3 is alone in the middle and their defencemen are exposed. A completed quick-up or a well-timed stretch is devastating against a 2-1-2 for exactly this reason.
• Glass and out is a legitimate answer. Against sustained hard forechecking, refusing to turn the puck over in front of your own net is itself a strategy.

Against a 1-3-1

Read

One forward token-pressures, three stretch across the neutral zone, one defenceman anchors behind — less a forecheck than a wall

Key

It takes away every long pass — the stretch is dead, the cross-ice over is dead, and anything through the middle of the neutral zone is dead

Mindset

Lots of time and nowhere to go — the opposite problem to the 2-1-2, and it requires the opposite temperament

Action

Skate it out — one token forechecker cannot stop a defenceman carrying with speed, and making the puck-carrier a threat is what forces the wall to break shape

Action

Use short passes up the wall and along the boards, not through the middle — the wall lanes are the softest part of the shape

Options

Chip-and-chase is not a defeat — against a genuine trap it is frequently the highest-value option, because forcing a pass into three players turns into an odd-man rush the other way

Action

Attack the width — the 1-3-1 sacrifices lateral coverage to hold the middle, so quick side-to-side movement makes them slide, and sliding creates seams

One line: one forward token-pressures, three stretch across the neutral zone, one defenceman anchors behind. Less a forecheck than a wall.

What it takes away: every long pass. The stretch is dead, the cross-ice over is dead, and anything through the middle of the neutral zone is dead.

How to break it:

• You will have lots of time and nowhere to go. This is the opposite problem to the 2-1-2 and requires the opposite temperament.
• Skate it out. A 1-3-1 with one token forechecker cannot stop a defenceman carrying the puck with speed. Making the puck-carrier a threat is what forces the wall to break shape.
• Use short passes up the wall and along the boards, not through the middle. The wall lanes are the softest part of the shape.
• Chip-and-chase is not a defeat. Against a genuine trap, putting the puck behind them and racing for it is frequently the highest-value option available, because the alternative — forcing a pass into three players — turns into an odd-man rush the other way.
• Attack the width. The 1-3-1 sacrifices lateral coverage to hold the middle. Quick side-to-side movement makes them slide, and sliding creates seams.

Against a full-ice press

Read

All-out pressure, all five opponents pushing up, usually late and chasing a goal

Key

A press by definition leaves space behind it — one clean pass through the first layer and you are attacking an outnumbered defence

Risk

A turnover under a press is an immediate high-danger chance

Priority

First layer first — don't hunt the killer stretch pass. Beat the first forechecker with a short, safe play, and the space behind will still be there two seconds later

Options

Glass and out is completely defensible — take the icing if you have to, because an icing costs you a defensive-zone draw and a press turnover costs you a goal

Rule

After your own icing the NHL and IIHF bar the change (Rule 81.4) — but the bar lifts to replace an injured player, to put a pulled goalkeeper back, or when a penalty changes on-ice strength; never for a tired line

Rule

The post-icing no-change bar is not universal: USA Hockey's Rule 624 attaches no substitution restriction to an icing at all, and Hockey Canada's 6.7(d) applies its 'no-change on icing' rule only in U18AAA, Junior, and in Senior at the Member's option

One line: all-out pressure, all five opponents pushing up, usually late and chasing a goal.

How to break it:

• The reward is enormous. A press by definition leaves space behind it. One clean pass through the first layer and you are attacking an outnumbered defence.
• The risk is equally enormous. A turnover under a press is an immediate high-danger chance.
• First layer first. Don't hunt the killer stretch pass. Beat the first forechecker with a short, safe play, and the space behind will still be there two seconds later.
• Glass and out is completely defensible. Under a press, getting the puck the length of the ice away and forcing them to reset is a win. Take the icing if you have to — a press turnover costs you a goal, and an icing costs you a defensive-zone draw and, under the NHL and the IIHF, your line change (Rule 81.4). ⚠️ That bar is neither universal nor absolute. USA Hockey's Rule 624 attaches no substitution restriction to an icing at all, and Hockey Canada's 6.7(d) applies its "'no-change on icing' rule" only "[i]n categories of U18AAA, Junior, and at the option of the Member in Senior". And where it does bind you, 81.4's own exceptions let you substitute "to replace an injured player", to put back a goalkeeper who had been pulled for an extra attacker, or when a penalty has changed on-ice strength — so a hurt teammate comes off; a tired one does not. Section 3 sets the rule out in full.

When they are already set — the control breakout

Key

A control breakout is a five-player pattern run from full possession behind your own net, against a trap that is already set and waiting

Action

The four players without the puck all move, with speed, and the carrier picks whichever route the trap has not taken away

Options

Blue-to-blue stretch — the centre swings behind the net with speed while wingers wait at each blue line, giving the puck-carrying D four options

Options

Strong-side slant — the centre and strong-side winger swing together, one slanting inside and one staying wide, with the far winger high

Options

Three high — all three forwards stay up in the neutral zone and the D holds the puck a beat before choosing; not the power-play umbrella of the same name

Convention

One coaching manual, Johnston and Walter's Hockey Plays and Strategies, is the source for all three; it presents them as workable and advises drilling one rather than carrying all three, and no published count says which teams run which

Never

Stand still waiting for the pass, unless your pattern posts a winger up on purpose — otherwise a control breakout with stationary receivers is a slow breakout into a set trap

Technique

Posted up still means body open to the ice, head up and never your back to the boards. Get your skates parallel to the wall instead, forearm and hip into contact if it comes, chin off your chest

Everything above answers a forecheck that is coming at you. This answers the opposite problem: you have the puck behind your own net with full control, nobody is pressuring you, and the reason nobody is pressuring you is that all five of them are standing in the neutral zone waiting. Chipping it out gives them the puck. Skating into them gives them the puck.

A control breakout is a coordinated five-player pattern designed for exactly that. It works on two conditions: the four players without the puck all move, with speed — bar a receiver your pattern deliberately posts up — and the puck carrier knows where every one of them will be and picks whichever the trap has not taken away. The carrier is not choosing between two safe outlets; they are picking whichever of four or five running teammates the trap has failed to cover. Run properly these do not merely escape the zone — they often arrive with speed and produce a chance.

Three are set out in Mike Johnston and Ryan Walter's Hockey Plays and Strategies, the coaching manual this section follows and the only source here for them. There is no published count of which teams run which:

• Blue-to-blue stretch. The puck-carrying defenceman waits behind the net for the centre to come back with speed; the centre swings through behind the net, the partner swings to the opposite corner, and the two wingers wait at the corners of the near and far blue lines. That gives the carrier four options — hand it to the centre to weave through, or move it to either winger, or back to the partner and up the far side.
• Strong-side slant. The centre swings behind the net or into the far corner and the strong-side winger swings with them; as the pair move up ice, one slants inside and one stays wide. The far winger stations themselves in the middle of the far blue line ready to come back into the play, and the partner waits deep in the corner. The pass goes D-to-D first, and the second defenceman then chooses between the slanting centre through mid-ice, the wide winger, or the far winger off the boards. The two swinging players are the ones who break the trap, and they only do it with speed.
• Three high — not the power-play umbrella of the same name, which Special Teams covers. Here the carrier holds the puck behind the net for a beat while all three forwards stay high in the neutral zone and the partner supports wide into a corner. The carrier then steps out and picks: the centre curling through mid-ice, or a winger either moving or posted up — standing still along the boards at a line. Posted up still means body open to the ice and head up, and never your back to the boards. Get your skates parallel to the wall instead, forearm and hip into contact if it comes, and chin off your chest; a stationary receiver on the wall is the one who gets hit, and Body Contact and Battles covers the override. If the centre takes it under pressure, they can chip it past and turn it into a footrace.

Expect to be taught one of them, not three. That manual treats all three as workable and warns that a team trying to hold all three executes none of them well, so its advice is to pick one and drill it until nobody has to think. Find out which one is yours, and learn where you are standing in it — every one of these depends on four players being somewhere specific at the same moment.

---

7. Breakouts from a Defensive-Zone Faceoff

Key

The moment after a defensive-zone draw is the most structured situation in hockey and the best chance for a genuine set play — coaching emphasis, not a counted ranking

Options

Off a won draw — the wheel off the faceoff, or its three variations: win-and-up, win-and-reverse, and the modified wheel

Technique

Win-and-reverse works because the centre swings low behind the play after a draw rather than sprinting up ice

Action

Decide the play before the puck drops — look at your winger, look at your partner, know what happens next

Priority

Off a lost draw your first job is defensive, not offensive. Get to your coverage assignment immediately

Convention

Under the house-default low zone collapse, wingers get to the points, because a lost defensive-zone draw usually goes back for a point shot

Never

Chase as a group — that is exactly how the goal gets scored

Read

Once you win it back, treat it as a quick-up — they have just committed to offence and their structure is at its weakest

The moment after a defensive-zone draw is the most structured situation in hockey (coaching emphasis, not a counted ranking): everyone's feet are set, everyone knows where everyone is, and nothing is moving yet. It is the single best opportunity for a genuine set play — and the point at which your team's lack of one is most obvious.

Alignment, draw technique and faceoff violations are in Faceoffs. What follows is only the breakout that comes out of the draw. (The common defensive-zone setup: centre on the dot, one defenceman on the boards side and one in the slot, wingers on the hash marks — though which winger stands where varies by team.)

Off a won draw, the classic set play is a wheel off the faceoff: the centre pulls the puck back to the defenceman behind and to the side, who collects it and wheels behind the net while the far winger releases up the wall as the primary target and the centre curls low to support. Three variations worth knowing:

• Win-and-up: the centre wins it directly to the boards-side winger or defenceman for an immediate wall exit. Fastest, most contested.
• Win-and-reverse: wheel is called, the forecheck arrives instantly, and the defenceman reverses to the centre swinging low behind the play. This is why the centre swings low after a draw rather than sprinting up ice.
• The modified wheel: the weak-side winger drives across the middle instead of up their own wall, dragging an opposing defenceman with them and opening the middle for the centre. Depends entirely on all five knowing it is on.

The one thing that makes any of them work: the play is decided before the puck drops. Look at your winger, look at your partner, know what happens next.

Off a lost draw, the opposition has possession in your zone with everyone set — the most dangerous routine situation in hockey, which is coaching emphasis and not a counted ranking. Your first job is defensive, not offensive: get to your coverage assignment immediately (man or zone depends on your system — see Defensive Zone Coverage). Wingers get to the points, because a lost defensive-zone draw usually goes back for a point shot and under the house-default low zone collapse closing it down is your job. Do not chase as a group — that is exactly how the goal gets scored. And once you win it back, treat it as a quick-up: they have just committed to offence and their structure is at its weakest.

---

8. Delayed Calls and the 6-on-5 Breakout

Breaking out under a delayed penalty

Rule

NHL Rule 15.1 — when a penalty is committed by a player of the team not in control of the puck, play stops when the team to be penalised gains control of the puck

Key

Control, not touch — control is "the act of propelling the puck with the stick, hand or feet", and is not lost when the puck is contacted by an opponent, the boards or the net

Rule

The offending team cannot score unless the non-offending team shoots the puck into their own net (Rule 78.5(xi)); if you score, a minor penalty is washed out (Rule 15.2), but majors and match penalties are still assessed

Rule

A goal on a delayed call does not wash out everything the offender owes — with two or more minors called on the play the offending captain picks which single minor is washed out (NHL 15.2), and a double minor under Rules 47, 58, 60 or 62, high-sticking among them, still costs two minutes (15.3)

Convention

Pulling the goalie here is a coaching choice, not an automatic consequence of the arm going up — plenty of rec, beer-league and youth teams do not, and often should not, and in USA Hockey Blind Hockey it is barred during play altogether

Rule

USA Hockey's Blind Hockey rules bar the pull during play — on a delayed penalty the extra skater joins with the goalkeeper still in net, and any other goalie-for-skater swap must wait for a stoppage; a goalkeeper who skates off during play brings a stoppage and a minor for delay of game

Rule

A goalie removed for an extra attacker in regular-season overtime must wait for the next stoppage and cannot change on the fly, or it is a bench minor for an ineligible player (NHL Rule 84.2)

Rule

The other three books searched allow the goalie back on the fly — IIHF 84.2, USA Hockey 205(a) at any time during play, Hockey Canada Interpretation 1 to Rule 6.1(b); overtime is played across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland only in NIHL and some SNL (In-House Rules 84)

Never

Clear the puck — a clear surrenders control and ends the advantage for nothing, and coaches name it the commonest delayed-penalty error in amateur hockey, though no count measures it

Action

Take the safe possession play every time — D-to-D behind the net, back to the point, hold it in the corner — and buy time for the goalie to reach the bench

Risk

The own-goal is the only way you can lose from here, so no blind passes back through your own crease with an empty net behind it

The rule, verified: under NHL Rule 15.1, when a penalty is committed by a player of the team not in control of the puck, the referee raises an arm to signal a delayed penalty; play stops when the team to be penalised gains control of the puck. Two crucial refinements:

• Control, not touch. The rulebook's glossary defines control of the puck as "the act of propelling the puck with the stick, hand or feet," and specifies that control is not lost when the puck is contacted by an opponent, the boards or the net, provided the player in control keeps propelling it. A deflection off the offending team does not end the delayed penalty; possession does.
• You cannot be scored on, with one exception. Rule 78.5(xi): during the delayed calling of a penalty, the offending team cannot score unless the non-offending team shoots the puck into their own net. And Rule 15.2: if you do score, the minor penalty "shall not be imposed" — while "major and match penalties shall be imposed in the normal manner regardless of whether or not a goal is scored." ⚠️ What the goal washes out is one minor, not every minor on the play, and two clauses say so. Rule 15.2's second paragraph: where "two or more minor penalties were to be imposed and a goal is scored on the play by the non-offending side, the Captain of the offending team shall designate to the Referee which minor penalty(ies) will be assessed and which minor penalty will be washed out as a result of the scoring of the goal." So against two infractions you get one of them cancelled and the other team chooses which. And Rule 15.3 takes the double minor out of the bargain altogether: where the penalty is under Rule 47 head-butting, Rule 58 butt-ending, Rule 60 high-sticking or Rule 62 spearing "and a goal is scored, two minutes of the appropriate penalty will be assessed to the offending player." High-sticking is much the commonest of those four, so the ordinary blood-drawing double minor still costs two minutes however well you converted the 6-on-5.

What that means for your breakout: if your goalie comes off, you have a few seconds of free 6-on-5 with essentially zero defensive risk.

With the goalie off:

• Do not clear the puck. Ever. A clear surrenders control and ends the advantage for nothing. Coaching material names it the commonest delayed-penalty error in amateur hockey, though no count measures that.
• Take the safe possession play every time. D-to-D behind the net, back to the point, hold it in the corner. The goal is to keep control until your sixth attacker is on the ice.
• Buy time for the change. Playing the puck back and even out of the attacking zone to let the goalie reach the bench and the extra attacker join is standard and correct.
• Then attack. Once you're set, you have a genuine 6-on-5 that cannot be punished. Get a shot on net; the worst outcome is a whistle and a power play.
• The own-goal is real. It is the only way you can lose from here — so no blind passes back through your own crease with an empty net behind it. NHL Rule 84.2 spells out the extreme case: in regular-season overtime, if your goalie is off for a delayed penalty and you shoot it into your own net, the game is over and the team that was about to be penalised wins.

The 6-on-5 breakout with your goalie pulled

Mindset

A completely different problem to the delayed penalty, because now a mistake ends the game

Rule

Icing still applies — at six skaters against five you are not shorthanded, so a clear from your own half that reaches the far goal line is iced in all four books (NHL and IIHF 81.1; USA Hockey 624; Hockey Canada 6.7(a))

Rule

Only two of the four books then freeze your bench — NHL and IIHF 81.4 stop the team that iced changing; USA Hockey 624 writes no bar and 204(a) gives both benches their change at every stoppage; Hockey Canada 6.7(d) applies it in U18AAA and Junior, and in Senior at the Member's option

Rule

That freeze does not strand your goaltender — NHL and IIHF 81.4 both except "a player substitution to replace a goalkeeper who had been substituted for an extra attacker", and Hockey Canada 6.7(d)(i) writes the same exception first; the tired skaters are what you cannot change

Key

Icing removes the long clear, not the glass clear — a glass clear is deliberately slow and wide, so it dies in the neutral zone and never reaches the far goal line

Action

Aim the glass clear to land in the neutral zone with a teammate skating onto it

Priority

Possession over speed — an empty net behind you means any turnover is a goal against, so the controlled exit is now the only correct exit

Action

Use the sixth attacker as a low outlet giving you a short, certain pass, not standing in front of their net

Goal

Enter with control — after the effort of a 6-on-5 exit, a dump-in against five defenders collapsed in front of their own net gives you nothing

Late in a game, chasing a goal, goalie on the bench. This is a completely different problem to the delayed penalty, because now a mistake ends the game.

• Icing still applies — but read 81.4 to the end, because it has an exception written for exactly this situation. Rule 81.1 applies icing to a team "equal or superior in numerical strength" — with six skaters against five you are not shorthanded, so a clear from your own half that reaches the far goal line is icing and brings the puck back to your own end. It also prevents your line changing (Rule 81.4) — and in a 6-on-5 that is close to fatal. ⚠️ What it does not do is strand your goaltender on the bench. NHL Rule 81.4 bars substitutions after your own icing, "However, a team shall be permitted to make a player substitution to replace a goalkeeper who had been substituted for an extra attacker, to replace an injured player, or when a penalty has been assessed which affects the on-ice strength of either team." IIHF 81.4 carries that same goalkeeper exception word for word, ahead of the broken-skate one noted in section 3. So you can put the goalie back in; what you cannot do is get the tired skaters off. ⚠️ And the bench freeze itself is not universal. Icing is — Hockey Canada 6.7(a) uses the same "equal or superior in numerical strength to the opposing team" test and USA Hockey 624(a) reaches any team that shoots it down from its own half — but USA Hockey attaches no substitution restriction to icing at all (Rule 624 read whole has none, and Rule 204(a) gives each team its change at every stoppage), and Hockey Canada rations it by division: 6.7(d) applies its "'no-change on icing' rule" only "[i]n categories of U18AAA, Junior, and at the option of the Member in Senior" — and even there 6.7(d)(i) lists the same exception first, "[t]o replace a Goaltender that has been substituted for an extra attacker." Check which book you are under before you price the clear.
• What icing removes is the long clear, not the glass clear. A hard, high, length-of-ice dump is off the table. But off the glass and out is still available, exactly as described in section 3 — a glass clear is deliberately slow and wide, so it dies in the neutral zone and never reaches the far goal line, which is precisely why it rarely ices. The distinction is worth keeping straight: what you cannot afford at 6-on-5 is distance, not the play. Aim it to land in the neutral zone with a teammate skating onto it.
• Prioritise possession over speed. You must not turn it over — an empty net behind you means any turnover is a goal against. The controlled exit is now the only correct exit.
• Use the extra body as a low outlet. The sixth attacker is most useful giving you a short, certain pass, not standing in front of their net. Numbers below the puck are what let you exit cleanly against a team that has nothing to lose by pressing.
• Enter with control. After the effort of a 6-on-5 exit, a dump-in against five defenders collapsed in front of their own net gives you nothing. ⚠️ If you hear that shape called a box, be clear which box is meant: it is the five-skater collapsing box — all five inside the house, conceding the outside — set out in Defensive Zone Coverage, not the four-player penalty-kill box in Special Teams. Same word, different shapes. See Zone Entries and Game Management.

Breaking out on a delayed offside

Key

Keep your head up and expect to be hit — in all four books nothing in the rule covers you once the puck has left your stick

Key

The linesperson's raised arm is not a stoppage, and a whistle for an imminent hit stops the play rather than a body already committed at speed

Rule

On a delayed offside NHL and IIHF 83.3 stop play if an attacker forces you deeper or is about to make contact — but both triggers name the defending puck carrier, so both lapse the instant you pass

Rule

Hockey Canada 6.11(b)(ii) (the stop-play clause) writes no pressure limb and no contact limb at all, so nothing in that rule stops a forechecker closing on you

Rule

USA Hockey 630(d)'s only limb reaching a forechecker is "continues to apply pressure to the defending puck carrier", which lapses on your pass too — and it is granted only at Youth 15-Only and above, Girls 16U and above, High School and Adult

Action

Play it as an ordinary breakout under pressure — take the extra look, and take it with your head up

Never

Put your back to the boards and wait because the arm is up. Get your skates parallel to the wall instead, forearm and hip, head up and chin off your chest

Keep your head up and expect to be hit — in all four books. An attacker has beaten the puck over your blue line, the linesperson's arm is up, and you have the puck in your own end with what feels like free time to make a clean outlet. The raised arm is not a stoppage. You are still playing the puck, the forecheck is still coming, and in none of the four books does the rule still cover you once the puck has left your stick.

Under the NHL and the IIHF the linesperson stops play if, during the delayed offside, an attacker "forces the defending puck carrier further back into his own zone, or who is about to make physical contact with the defending puck carrier" (NHL Rule 83.3; IIHF Rule 83.3 is the same sentence with "their"). Both of those triggers name the defending puck carrier — and that is you only while you have the puck. Make the outlet pass and the protection travels with the puck to your teammate, not with you. ⚠️ Under USA Hockey Rule 630(d) the only limb that reaches a forechecker at all names the carrier too, and lapses on the same pass — it is "continues to apply pressure to the defending puck carrier". That rule is also granted only at Youth 15-Only and above, Girls 16U and above, High School and Adult; below those levels the whistle comes immediately and the situation never arises. ⚠️ Under Hockey Canada Rule 6.11(b)(ii) nothing in the rule stops a forechecker closing on you at all — its stop-play clause has no pressure limb and no contact limb, and play stops only "if any attacking player touches the puck or attempts to gain possession of a loose puck while the puck is still in the attacking zone". And a whistle for an imminent hit stops the play; it does not stop a body already committed at speed.

Rules Primer works the four books through in full, including what the attacking player in the zone has to do.

So play it as an ordinary breakout under pressure. Under the NHL and the IIHF you do have a beat more than usual, because a forechecker who drives you deeper ends the play — but that beat ends the moment the puck leaves your stick, so take the extra look with your head up. Do not use it to put your back to the boards and wait for a whistle. Get your skates parallel to the wall instead, forearm and hip, head up and chin off your chest (Body Contact and Battles). Everything in sections 3 and 9 still applies — read the pressure, pick the option, move the puck.

---

9. Reading Pressure

Every choice in this document depends on one question: how much time do I have? Here is how to answer it.

Reading it yourself

Priority

Every choice depends on one question — how much time do I have?

Action

Look before you have the puck, not after; the shoulder check on the way back to a retrieval is a defenceman's highest-value habit — coaching emphasis, not a counted ranking

Read

Count the forecheckers, not the pressure — one means options and probably time to wheel, two means the corners are gone and you are playing wall/reverse/rim, three deep means somebody up ice is free

Read

Watch their feet, not their sticks — a forechecker gliding is containing you, a forechecker striding is committing

Read

Know which way they are steering you; if you can feel yourself being funnelled, go the other way while the option exists

Key

Time is a two-second window, not a state — by the time you feel pressure the pass you wanted has usually already closed, so decide early

• Look before you have the puck, not after. The check over your inside shoulder on the way back to a retrieval is a defenceman's highest-value habit — coaching emphasis, not a counted ranking. You cannot buy that information back once you're facing the boards.
• Count the forecheckers, not the pressure. One forechecker means you have options and probably time to wheel. Two means the corners are gone and you're playing wall/reverse/rim. Three deep means somebody up ice is free — and also that you may have nothing low.
• Watch their feet, not their sticks. A forechecker gliding is containing you; a forechecker striding is committing. The first calls for a play up the wall or a carry; the second is what a reverse eats alive.
• Know which way they're steering you. Most forechecks want you on one specific side. If you can feel yourself being funnelled, that's the read — go the other way while the option exists.
• Time is a two-second window, not a state. By the time you feel pressure, the pass you wanted has usually already closed. Decide early.

The goalie's role

Key

Your goaltender is standing still, facing the play, with the clearest view of everything behind your defenceman's back — worth nothing unless the words are agreed and the calls come early

Convention

Goalie vocabulary varies by team — agree yours in advance rather than assuming

Key

"Time" means nobody near you, turn and make a play; "man on" means pressure arriving now, do not turn into it

Key

"Up" means the wall lane is open; "wheel" means you have a step; "leave it" or "set" means a rim stopped and left stationary for you

Never

Use "over" without agreeing the sense — this list uses Sense B, the D-to-D behind your own net; if your team means cross-ice, your goalie must say "D" or "partner" instead

Never

Take a "man on" call with your back to the boards. Get your skates parallel to the wall instead, forearm and hip, head up and chin off your chest

Action

Calls must be early and loud — a call arriving as the forechecker does is worse than no call, because it makes the defenceman hesitate

Key

This is not only the goalie's job — D2, and the winger who can see the weak-side defenceman stepping down, both know things the puck-carrier does not

Your goaltender is standing still, facing the play, with the clearest view on the ice of everything happening behind your defenceman's back. Under pressure, a defenceman is physically and mentally loaded; the goalie is calm. Whether any of that reaches your defenceman depends entirely on the vocabulary being agreed in advance and the calls coming early.

The standard goalie vocabulary — your team may vary it, and should agree it in advance. General call discipline and the full communication treatment are in On-Ice Communication; what follows is only the breakout set.

• "Time" — nobody near you, turn and make a play.
• "Man on" — pressure arriving now; do not turn into it. Some teams add a side: "man on, left". And never take it with your back to the boards. Get your skates parallel to the wall instead, forearm and hip, head up and chin off your chest (Body Contact and Battles).
• "Reverse" — the forechecker has over-committed past you; the space behind is open.
• "Up" — the wall lane is open, hit the winger.
• "Over" — this list uses "over" in Sense B: go behind the net to your partner (D-to-D). That is the goalie-call convention and it is the opposite risk profile to the cross-ice "over" in section 3. If your team uses "over" to mean cross-ice, your goalie must use a different word here — "D" or "partner" — or someone will eventually throw a puck across their own slot because the goalie shouted it.
• "Wheel" — you have a step, take it around.
• "Leave it" or "set" — the goalie has stopped a rim behind the net and left it stationary for you. Some coaches prefer "leave" because its sound is harder to confuse with "up" and "over"; two-syllable calls survive a noisy rink better.

Calls must be early and loud. A call arriving as the forechecker does is worse than no call, because it makes the defenceman hesitate. And this is not only the goalie's job: D2, and the winger who can see the weak-side defenceman stepping down, both know things the puck-carrier does not.

---

10. The Trapezoid and Retrieval

Rule

Under the NHL and IIHF books the goaltender may play the puck behind the goal line only inside the marked trapezoid; outside it is a two-minute minor for delay of game, and "the determining factor shall be the position of the puck" (NHL Rules 27.8 and 63.2(viii))

Rule

Exactly one exception, the NOTE to 63.2(viii) — no minor is assessed "when a goalkeeper plays the puck while maintaining skate contact with his goal crease"; there is no teammate-based exception

Never

Take the geometry from Rule 27.8 — its six-foot figure is stale, describing the pre-2014 trapezoid; Rule 1.8 describes the lines actually painted

Rule

The trapezoid applies in the NHL and under the IIHF book (IIHF Rule 27.7), the KHL reportedly too but unverified; in England and Wales the status is unsettled — England Ice Hockey's Rules & Regulations 22.3 say it is "not currently enforced", so assume it binds and ask your league

Key

Neither USA Hockey nor Hockey Canada has a trapezoid — under those books your goalie may fetch a rim from anywhere behind the net, so find out which book your league runs

Rule

"No trapezoid" is not "no restriction" — USA Hockey 614(c) makes it a minor for a goalkeeper who freezes the puck outside the "goalkeeper's privileged" area, and equally when "the puck is behind the goal line and their body is entirely outside of the goal crease"

Rule

Hockey Canada's bar is the wider one — leave the crease and "they will not be allowed to freeze the puck. If they do, they will be assessed a Minor penalty. No warning will be issued" (Interpretation 3 to Rule 10.1(a), clause v) — but on a rim behind your net it lands where USA Hockey 614(c)(1) does

Rule

Hockey Canada's Interpretation 3 to Rule 10.1(a), clause ii, lets a goaltender come out to cut down the angle and, after stopping the shot, cover the puck; taking it as the exception to clause v's outside-the-crease bar is a reading, not a ruling — the NHL and IIHF 63.2(vi) Notes write it in

Action

Look behind your own net before your first shift and see whether the trapezoid lines are painted — a hint about which book you are under, not a ruling, since the rule turns on where the puck is

This rule reshapes the entire retrieval game, and it is the reason rim targeting is a skill rather than a shrug.

The rule, verified. The goaltender may play the puck behind the goal line only inside the marked trapezoid, and doing it outside that area is a two-minute minor for delay of game (Rules 27.8 and 63.2(viii) — 63.2(viii) is the one that assesses it: "On a goalkeeper who plays the puck outside of the designated area behind the net. The determining factor shall be the position of the puck."). Use Rule 1.8 for the geometry, never 27.8: the lines begin eight feet from each goal post at the goal line and widen to eleven feet from each post — 28 feet apart — at the end boards. There is exactly one exception, and it is the NOTE to 63.2(viii): "The minor penalty will not be assessed when a goalkeeper plays the puck while maintaining skate contact with his goal crease." There is no teammate-based exception.

(The two rules give different near dimensions, and 27.8 is simply the older one — it is stale, not self-contradictory. Rule 27.8, which defines the penalty, still reads "six feet from either goal post" — wording left over from before the trapezoid was widened by two feet each side in 2014. Rule 1.8 describes the lines actually painted on the ice, and its eleven-feet-from-post figure is what produces the 28-foot span both rules agree on. Trust Rule 1.8. Handled the same way in Defender and Forechecking Systems.)

Where it applies: the NHL and IIHF play. The KHL is commonly said to have one as well, though that one is unverified here: no KHL rulebook was available to check it against. The IIHF's own 2021 announcement of its unified rulebook dates the IIHF's adoption to the 2021-22 season; the NHL's commonly given 2005-06 date is in no rulebook held here. And IIHF play is not only international hockey — IIHF Rule 27.7 carries the same rule in the same terms ("A goalkeeper shall not play the puck outside of the designated area behind the net… The determining factor shall be the position of the puck", with the same skate-contact-with-the-crease exception), and the IIHF book is the book British hockey runs on — the In-House Rules adopt it for IHUK and BUIHA fixtures "in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (the Home Countries)", and the Elite League is understood to run it the same way, though its Casebook is unread here. Neither the 2025-26 nor the 2026-27 In-House Rules amend the IIHF book on this point. In England and Wales, though, treat the status as unsettled rather than settled: England Ice Hockey's own Rules & Regulations 22.3 say the restricted area is "not currently enforced to allow ice rinks the necessary time to make the changes to implement this rule" — that edition is 2024-25, and both the 2025-26 and the 2026-27 In-House Rules are silent on it, so the published documents do not resolve whether the suspension still stands. Assume it binds, and ask your league. Neither North American governing body's book has one. The USA Hockey Playing Rules 2025-29 and the Hockey Canada Playing Rules 2026-2028 mark no goalkeeper's restricted area anywhere in their rink sections, and neither limits where a goalkeeper may play the puck — USA Hockey's delay-of-game rule (610) and Hockey Canada's (10.1) both leave that alone. Neither leaves the goalkeeper unrestricted back there, though, and that matters to a rim you intend your goalie to stop and hold. USA Hockey Rule 614(c) assesses a minor for delay of game to a goalkeeper "who falls on or gathers the puck into their body and causes a stoppage of play" on any of four triggers: (1) "[t]he puck is behind the goal line and their body is entirely outside of the goal crease"; (2) they "fail to play the puck with their stick when provided the opportunity to do so prior to being pressured by an attacking player"; (3) "[t]he puck is outside the boundaries of the 'goalkeeper's privileged' area"; (4) they "hold or place the puck against any part of the goal frame or boards", or intentionally drop it on the back of the netting. ⚠️ For a rim behind the net it is trigger (1) that bites, not (3) — the privileged area is bigger than it sounds. The rule's own Note draws it "by connecting the end zone face-off spots with an imaginary line and imaginary lines from each face-off spot running perpendicular to the end boards", and USA Hockey's Casebook answers the question directly: "Does the goalkeeper's Privileged Area include the area behind the goal line? Yes… The goalkeeper's Privileged Area extends to the closer end boards" (Rule 614, Situation 14). So a goalie who sits on a rim directly behind your net is inside the privileged area and is penalised anyway, because the puck is behind the goal line — the Casebook says so in terms, ruling that "if the puck is behind the goal line or outside of the privileged area, a minor penalty for delaying the game must be assessed" (Situation 12). What trigger (3) reaches is the corner. And trigger (2) is the general principle behind both: a goalkeeper who beats an attacker to a loose puck inside the privileged area and falls on it still takes the minor, because "[t]he goalkeeper has an obligation to play the puck with their stick, just like any other player" (Situation 6). ⚠️ Two Casebook rulings pull the other way and are worth knowing before you shout at your goalie: no penalty where the goalkeeper had "some part of" their body "in contact with the goal crease when initial contact with the puck is made" (Situation 7), and none where the attacking team "is in a position to pressure the goalkeeper" (Situation 11) — the same pressure test trigger (2) writes. Hockey Canada bars the freeze as well, and its bar is the wider of the two. Its Interpretation 3 to Rule 10.1(a) provides that once a goaltender leaves the crease "they will not be allowed to freeze the puck. If they do, they will be assessed a Minor penalty. No warning will be issued." ⚠️ That clause is half of a five-clause Interpretation, though, and a goaltender told only that half has been told the rule wrong. Clause ii of the same Interpretation provides that "[t]he goaltender may come out of their crease to cut down the angle and catch the shot or, after stopping the shot, cover the puck" — an express permission to cover a puck the goalie was outside the crease to stop. Hockey Canada publishes no sentence saying which of the two clauses governs, and no Hockey Canada casebook, situation handbook or bulletin was available here to settle it, so what follows is a reading of the text rather than a ruling. Three things support it. The Interpretation's own stated intent, one line above clause i, is "to eliminate unnecessary stoppages caused by the goaltender", which is not what a save-then-cover is. An absolute clause v would leave the second half of clause ii with nothing left to permit, and a reading that makes an express permission a dead letter is the weaker one. And Hockey Canada's five clauses map onto NHL Rule 63.2, where the other two books print the same pair with the exception written in: the NOTE to NHL 63.2(vi) reads "If a goalkeeper comes out of his crease to 'cut down the angle' on a shot and after making the save covers the puck, this shall be legal", and IIHF 63.2(VI) carries it in the plural. So read clause v as reaching the goaltender who leaves the crease to retrieve a puck — the rim in this section — and not the one who covers a save they came out to make. ⚠️ Wider does not mean it changes anything on this play, and that is the part to carry onto the ice. On the play this section is about, the two books land in the same place: a goalie who leaves the crease to collect a rim behind your own net and sits on it takes a minor under Hockey Canada's clause v and under USA Hockey's trigger (1) alike, and of the latter the Casebook says that once the puck is behind the goal line the minor "must be assessed" (Situation 12). Away from that play the two books diverge in both directions. Hockey Canada's clause v is the wider bar — it catches any freeze once you are out of the crease, anywhere on the ice, where USA Hockey's 614(c) runs on four separate triggers with Casebook carve-outs against them; and USA Hockey writes its pressure excuse for a goalkeeper outside the crease (Situation 11) where Hockey Canada writes one only for a goalkeeper inside it, "[a] goaltender may freeze the puck in the goal crease when under pressure from attacking players" (clause i). But Hockey Canada is the more lenient book in the crease, giving "one warning" before the minor for an unpressured freeze there (clause iii). And on the act a goalie actually gets caught by out there, all four books agree: a goaltender who races out to beat an attacker to a loose puck and, instead of playing it, jumps on it is penalised with no warning — Hockey Canada's clause iv, NHL Rule 63.2(vi) and IIHF Rule 63.2(VI) (both reaching a goalkeeper who "races out" of the crease "and instead of playing the puck jumps on the puck causing a stoppage of play"), and USA Hockey's Casebook Situation 6, "[t]he goalkeeper has an obligation to play the puck with their stick, just like any other player." Fetch a rim; do not sit on it. Goaltender sets both books out in full. How much rec, beer-league and youth hockey runs on those two books is a question about leagues rather than about books, and this document has no count for it. In Britain the practical question may be the rink rather than the rule, so check whether the lines are actually painted behind your net. UK and England Rules records the same uncertainty.

What it does to your breakout

Never

Aim a rim straight into the corner under the NHL or IIHF book — your goalie legally cannot go and get it there, so a defenceman has to, under pressure, back to the forecheck

Options

Hard and all the way around, arriving where your winger can meet it in stride — good

Options

Tight and short, staying close enough behind the net that your goalie can legally stop it inside the trapezoid and leave it for you — good

Risk

Medium, dying in the corner outside the trapezoid — bad, because nobody can get it safely and the forecheck arrives first

Action

Agree in advance which of the two good ones you want

Key

With no trapezoid your goalie is a third puck-handler — they can play a rim anywhere behind the net and make the D-to-D for you, but neither USA Hockey nor Hockey Canada lets them freeze it out there

The retrieval technique itself is spread across several documents rather than held in one place: Defender covers planning the retrieval route and which way to pivot, Scanning and Anticipation covers the shoulder checks that have to happen before the puck arrives, Skating covers the cutback and lateral escapes off the wall, and Body Contact and Battles covers what happens when a forechecker gets there with you. The goalie's side is in Goaltender. What the rule changes is where you aim a rim:

• Your goalie legally cannot go and get a rim that dies in the corner. A defenceman has to, under pressure, back to the forecheck — the exact situation that produces turnovers behind your own net. So a rim aimed straight into the corner is a gift to the forecheck, not because the play is bad but because of who has to retrieve it.
• Two acceptable rims, one bad one. Hard and all the way around, arriving where your winger can meet it in stride — good. Tight and short, staying close enough behind the net that your goalie can legally stop it inside the trapezoid and leave it for you — good. Medium, dying in the corner outside the trapezoid — bad, because nobody can get it safely and the forecheck arrives first. Agree in advance which of the two good ones you want.
• If your league has no trapezoid, your game changes completely. Your goalie becomes a genuine third puck-handler: they can play a rim anywhere behind the net, make the D-to-D for you, and act as an extra breakout option. They still cannot sit on it, so do not aim a rim expecting it to be held until you arrive — USA Hockey Rule 614(c) makes it a minor for a goalkeeper to freeze the puck outside the "goalkeeper's privileged" area, and, for a rim behind your net, equally when "the puck is behind the goal line and their body is entirely outside of the goal crease"; Hockey Canada's Interpretation 3 to Rule 10.1(a), clause v, bars freezing a puck once they have left the crease, "No warning will be issued" — and a rim they went out to retrieve is exactly the case it reaches, unlike the save-then-cover that clause ii of the same Interpretation expressly permits. Find out which rules you are under — it changes what a rim is for.

---

Common Mistakes

Errors the body above does not cover — the ones that survive knowing the system.

• Sliding across to "screen" for the wheel. Standing in front of the net and holding the ice you already occupy is legal and useful under the NHL's book and the IIHF's — but not under USA Hockey's, where 625(a.1) makes a minor of "[p]roviding a protective screen and limiting the opportunity for an opposing player to apply pressure to a teammate in possession or control of the puck", standing still or not. Moving laterally into a forechecker's path is interference under all four books — NHL and IIHF 56.1 by name, USA Hockey by Rule 625's Note, Hockey Canada by 8.3 and CARHA by 66(a)(1) — and it costs you at least two minutes at the exact moment your partner had beaten the forecheck — two minutes is the floor, not the ceiling: NHL 56.4 allows a major on the degree of violence, and NHL 56.5 a game misconduct on top of it — though only "when a major penalty is imposed under this rule for an infraction resulting in an injury of an opponent", so within Rule 56 that ejection waits on somebody being hurt. ⚠️ Do not carry away that the NHL is the lenient book — it is not, and the NHL's penalty ladder does not stop at Rule 56. NHL Rule 21.1 assesses a match penalty, out for the balance of the game, "on any player who deliberately attempts to injure or who deliberately injures an opponent in any manner" — tied to no named foul, and needing no injury for the attempt. What differs between the four books is the bar, not whether an ejection is available at all. The NHL sets a high one on that route — a deliberate attempt to injure — while the other three reach an ejection from inside their own restraining-foul rules and at a lower bar. IIHF 56.5 reaches a major plus a game misconduct where it recklessly endangers, with nobody hurt. Hockey Canada 8.3(b) reaches the same pair on "the degree of violence of the impact" with nobody hurt, makes it mandatory where it injures, and 8.3(c) adds a match penalty for an attempt to injure by interference — a tier the IIHF book does not write at all. ⚠️ USA Hockey gets there differently, and it is the book you are under if you play in the United States: Rule 625 writes no tier above the minor, but a pick delivered as a body check to a player who did not see it coming leaves 625 — the Declaration of Player Safety sends it to the boarding, charging, checking-from-behind, head-contact or roughing rules, and 640(g) is a major plus a game misconduct where it recklessly endangers an opponent, 640(h) a match — both reaching only "actions falling under Rule 640(b, c, d, e or f)", not roughing at large — with 602(a)'s match penalty sitting outside both. Get there early or do not do it.
• Running a control breakout with nobody moving. The pattern is the easy part; the speed of the four players without the puck is what beats a set trap. And where your pattern does post a winger up on the wall on purpose, posted up still means body open to the ice, and never your back to the boards. Get your skates parallel to the boards instead, forearm and hip to the wall, head up and chin off your chest.
• Saying "onside means both skates over the line." That is the definition of offside, and players repeat it back inverted every season. One skate touching the line or behind it keeps you onside. Say it that way round or you will hesitate on a stretch pass you were entitled to take.
• Using the word "over" without knowing which "over" your team means. Cross-ice over is the riskiest of the nine breakout options; D-to-D over is one of the safest, and goalie call sheets usually mean the second. Two players with different definitions of one word is a puck through your own slot.
• Assuming a glass clear is unavailable at 6-on-5. It is the length-of-ice clear that is off the table, because icing applies. A glass clear that dies in the neutral zone cannot be icing and remains a legitimate safety valve.
• Waiting for a defender to touch the puck before believing it is icing. Hybrid icing is decided on who would have reached the puck first, and the linesperson must call it by the instant the first player's skate reaches the end-zone faceoff dot — the dot is the deadline, not the finish line. A race too close to call at that moment goes to icing. Your clear was iced long before anyone reached the puck.
• Assuming the goalie automatically comes off on a delayed penalty. It is a coaching choice, and in rec and youth hockey often the wrong one. Know your team's procedure; if there isn't one, just keep the puck.
• Pulling the goalie on a delayed penalty in regular-season overtime and then sneaking them back on the fly. NHL Rule 84.2 makes that a bench minor in sudden death. Of the four books here it is the NHL's alone — the IIHF's 84.2 imposes no such restriction, USA Hockey's Rule 205(a) lets a goalkeeper change "at any time during play" and its Casebook Situation 4 to that rule says they "may change on the fly during play... and return at any time", and Hockey Canada's Interpretation 1 to Rule 6.1(b) governs goaltenders changing on the fly by "the same rules that apply to the changing of players". Across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland overtime is played only in NIHL and in SNL where its regulations provide for it. The one rule set here that is stricter than the NHL is USA Hockey's Blind Hockey section, which bars the pull during play outright and makes skating off a minor for delay of game.
• Confusing holding the line with pinching when talking about how your glass clear got killed. Holding is staying at the blue line; pinching is stepping down inside it. They carry very different consequences when they fail.
• Quoting Rule 27.8's six feet for the trapezoid. The painted lines are Rule 1.8's — eight feet from each post at the goal line. Rule 27.8's six feet is not an error in arithmetic; it is an accurate description of the pre-2014 trapezoid that was never updated.
• Five players running five different plays. Not a skill failure. A communication failure, and the root cause of most of the above.

Check yourself

Answer each question before you go on — a real attempt, not a guess. Then go and check, because the checking is the part that does the work. Producing an answer and getting it wrong is worth more than recognising a right one, but only when the right answer follows: the section named with each question, and the Key Takeaways after them, are where you get it. Where the answer lives in another document, that is named too.

1. Your partner has the puck behind your own net and you are on the far side. Where do you go, and what is the one route you never take to get there? (§D-to-D)

2. You are shorthanded and under pressure in your own end. You fire it the length of the ice. What happens — and what would have to be true for the answer to change? (§When a clear is the right play, §Off the glass and out)

3. Name three of the nine breakout options. For one of them, say what you are reading that makes it the right choice rather than the others. (§3. The Named Breakout Options)

4. Someone shouts "over". What are the two things they might mean, and how do you tell which? (§Over)

5. You are the winger on the wall waiting for an outlet and the forechecker is arriving behind you. What have you already had to decide? (§Wheel, and Body Contact and Battles §6)

---

Key Takeaways

1. Do not move the puck through your own slot — not with a pass, not with your feet — unless the read is unmistakable. Behind your own net is the route across: intercepted there it costs nothing, intercepted in front it is a point-blank chance against. The cross-ice "over" in section 3 is the one option that asks you to do it, and it is the highest-risk of the nine breakout options — the forecheck has to have genuinely over-loaded one side with the middle empty, and the behind-the-net route has to be unavailable.
2. Default to leaving with the puck, and clear because you have read the situation rather than by reflex. In roughly 230,000 hand-tracked NHL zone exits — Corey Sznajder's manual dataset, roughly half the games of 2016-17 and 2017-18 rather than both seasons complete — published on Hockey Graphs, controlled exits led to a follow-on zone entry about 89% of the time against about 20% for dump-outs nobody recovered — though the study's own conclusion is that possession, not method, is the explanation: a dump-out your own team collects performs about as well.
3. Every swing breakout has five jobs — retriever D, support D, strong-side winger, weak-side winger, centre — and knowing which is yours before the puck is retrieved is most of the battle. The five-role structure is itself a coaching choice.
4. Wingers, in the conventional swing breakout: cover the opposing point while they still have the puck, then come down the wall to between the hash marks and the goal line as your team wins it. Time the arrival — better a little late than a little early — and receive with your body open to the ice. This is a system, not a law: a flat or spread structure holds you higher toward the blue line, and a stretch or flying-winger structure sends one winger up ice entirely. Ask which you play. One safety override outranks the play on the wall: never your back to the boards, and never duck. Get your skates parallel to the boards instead, forearm and hip to the wall, head up and chin off your chest.
5. Centres, in that same swing structure: stay low, inside the dots and below the hash marks, in the strong-side circle rather than on the wall, and leave with speed. The centre fly is an equally legitimate alternative. What never works is flying while your wingers hold high near the blue line, because then nobody is underneath the puck at all. Ask your coach which one you run.
6. Rim to beat a forechecker sealing you against the boards; reverse to beat one who has over-committed past you. Both go hard and low, because a soft one dies in the corner and is a gift — and the teammate arriving behind you must call "reverse", because you are looking the other way.
7. Read the forecheck before you pick the play — a 1-2-2 gives you time and takes the middle, a 2-1-2 takes your time and leaves space behind, a 1-3-1 kills the long pass. And when they are not coming at you at all but standing set and waiting, the answer is a control breakout — a coordinated five-player pattern, of which blue-to-blue stretch, strong-side slant and three high — the last being a breakout shape, not the power-play umbrella of that name — are the three set out in Johnston and Walter's Hockey Plays and Strategies, which is the only source here for them. It works only if the four players without the puck move — with speed, unless your pattern posts one of them up on purpose — and you should expect to be drilled in one of them rather than all three.
8. Agree what your calls mean before the game, starting with "over". A cross-ice over is the highest-risk play in a breakout; the D-to-D behind your own net — which most goalie vocabularies mean by the word — is one of the lowest.
9. Where the trapezoid applies — the NHL and IIHF play (IIHF Rule 27.7), and the KHL reportedly too though that one is unverified here — your goalie may not go and get a rim that dies in the corner. So rim hard all the way around to a winger, or tight enough behind the net for your goalie to stop it legally — never the medium rim dying outside the trapezoid. Neither USA Hockey nor Hockey Canada has one, and in England and Wales England Ice Hockey's Rules & Regulations 22.3 say the restricted area is "not currently enforced" — so check whether the lines are painted, assume it binds, and ask your league. Where there is no trapezoid, your goalie is a third puck-handler — though neither North American book lets them freeze the puck out there, so they fetch a rim rather than sit on it.
10. With a delayed penalty signalled against the other team you cannot be scored on except by your own hand (NHL Rule 78.5(xi)) — so keep the puck rather than clearing it. Pulling your goalie for the extra attacker there is a coaching choice, not automatic. In NHL regular-season overtime a pulled goalie may not return on the fly (Rule 84.2) — a restriction none of the other three books carries, USA Hockey (205(a) and its Casebook) and Hockey Canada (Interpretation 1 to Rule 6.1(b)) both permitting the on-the-fly change outright — and under the In-House Rules most games across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland play no overtime at all. USA Hockey's Blind Hockey rules go the other way and forbid the pull during play altogether.
11. On a delayed offside, keep your head up and expect to be hit. The linesperson's raised arm is not a stoppage. Under the NHL and the IIHF (Rule 83.3) an attacker who forces you deeper or is about to make contact ends the play — but both of those triggers name the defending puck carrier, so both lapse the instant you pass, as does USA Hockey 630(d)'s pressure limb. Hockey Canada 6.11(b)(ii) (the stop-play clause) writes no pressure limb and no contact limb at all.
12. Whether your partner may screen the net front for a wheel is a book question, not a technique question. Under the NHL's rules and the IIHF's — the book a British player is officiated under — standing your ground there is legal, and it is sliding across into the forechecker that is the minor. Under USA Hockey the screen itself is the minor: 625(a.1) penalises "[p]roviding a protective screen and limiting the opportunity for an opposing player to apply pressure to a teammate in possession or control of the puck", and standing still is no defence, because on a wheel your partner is the teammate in possession. USA Hockey publishes no interpretation of that clause, so if you play in the United States, ask your officials before you build a breakout on it.

Sources — retrieved 27 July 2026

Rules: National Hockey League Official Rules 2025-2026 (PDF) — Rule 1.2 (rink dimensions — 200 feet by 85 feet), Rule 1.5 (lines; blue lines 64 feet from the goal lines), Rule 1.6 (division of the ice surface into three zones — no dimensions), Rule 1.8 (goalkeeper's restricted area — the painted geometry, eight feet from each post widening to 28 feet at the boards), Rule 1.9 (face-off spots and circles), Rule 15.1, 15.2 and 15.3 (delayed penalty signalling; a goal washes out one minor, with the offending captain designating which where two or more were coming; and 15.3, under which a double minor for head-butting, butt-ending, high-sticking or spearing still costs "two minutes of the appropriate penalty" despite the goal), Rule 21.1 (match penalty — "A match penalty shall be imposed on any player who deliberately attempts to injure or who deliberately injures an opponent in any manner", tied to no named foul, so the NHL's top tier for a net-front pick sits outside Rule 56 altogether, and the NHL is not the lenient book on this play), Rule 27.8 (restricted area penalty — note the stale six-foot figure, superseded by Rule 1.8), Rule 56.1, read whole 7 September 2026 (interference: body position, and three permissive sentences of which only the first has no proviso — "allowed the ice he is standing on"; "may 'block' the path of an opponent provided he is in front of his opponent and moving in the same direction"; and the entitlement to "lengthen an opponent's path to the puck" under the stick/free-hand/illegal-check proviso — together with the two prohibitions that sit among them: "A player who is behind an opponent, who does not have the puck, may not use his stick, body or free hand in order to restrain his opponent, but must skate in order to gain or reestablish his proper position", and "[m]oving laterally and without establishing body position, then making contact with the non-puck carrier"; and picks — note that 56.1 itself says only that "an interference penalty shall be assessed"), Rule 56.2 (where the word minor is actually written), Rule 56.4 (major penalty for interference — the Referee "may assess a major penalty, based on the degree of violence, to a player guilty of interfering with an opponent", with no injury required), Rule 56.5 (the NHL's game misconduct for interference is conditional on injury — and then mandatory, not discretionary: "When a major penalty is imposed under this rule for an infraction resulting in an injury of an opponent, a game misconduct shall be imposed". The discretion in the NHL's ladder sits one step below, in 56.4's "may"), Rule 63.2(iii) (puck directly out of play from the defending zone, and its three exceptions), Rule 63.2(vi) and its NOTE, read 2 September 2026 by flattening the extraction because the quoted phrase breaks across a line and a plain grep for it returns nothing — the minor for a goalkeeper who "races out of his crease in an attempt to beat the attacking player to the puck and instead of playing the puck jumps on the puck causing a stoppage of play", and the NOTE that "[i]f a goalkeeper comes out of his crease to “cut down the angle” on a shot and after making the save covers the puck, this shall be legal"), Rule 63.2(viii) and its NOTE (the trapezoid penalty itself, and its sole skate-contact-with-the-crease exception), Rule 78.5(xi) (offending team cannot score during a delayed penalty except via an own goal), Rule 81.1–81.6 (icing; "equal or superior in numerical strength"; hybrid icing — decided on who would first touch the puck, with the end-zone dot as the decision deadline; the 81.4 line-change ban and its three exceptions, the first of which is the one that matters at 6-on-5 — a substitution "to replace a goalkeeper who had been substituted for an extra attacker, to replace an injured player, or when a penalty has been assessed which affects the on-ice strength of either team"), Rule 83.1 (off-side — on-side defined as either skate on or behind the line), Rule 83.3 (delayed off-side — the four triggers that end it, two of which name the defending puck carrier), Rule 84.2 (overtime, extra attacker, delayed-penalty own goal, and the pulled goalie who may not change on the fly), Rule 87.1 (time-outs — none granted to the defensive team following an icing), Glossary ("Control of the Puck") · USA Hockey Official Playing Rules 2025-29 (PDF) — Rule 624(b)(1), which limits the shorthanded icing nullification to Youth 15-Only and above, Girls 16U and above, High School and Adult classifications; and Rule 630(d), which grants the delayed offside to those same classifications only, and whose sole pressure limb is "continues to apply pressure to the defending puck carrier"; Rule 624 read whole — its four sub-sections (a)–(d) attach no substitution restriction to a team's own icing. Rule 205 Substitution of Goalkeepers, read 2 September 2026 — 205(a), under which a goalkeeper "may be changed for another goalkeeper or skater (who shall not have goalkeeper privileges) at any time during play provided the goalkeeper is at the bench and out of play prior to the substitute entering the ice", with no overtime condition; 205(b), which carries two different rules in its two paragraphs — where the substitution is for a skater, the original goalkeeper "may return, by way of a legal line change, once play has resumed", but where "the substitute goalkeeper enters the game during a stoppage", "[t]he original goalkeeper may not return to play until the next stoppage of play. For a violation, the offending team shall be assessed a bench minor penalty for illegal substitution"; and 205(c), under which a goalkeeper who has been substituted for after going to the players' bench during a stoppage "shall not resume their position until the next stoppage of play, except that they shall be permitted immediate re-entry into the game when any penalty is imposed". ⚠️ Two of Rule 205's three limbs therefore make a goalkeeper wait, and neither trigger is an overtime one: 205(b)'s second paragraph is triggered by a goalkeeper-for-goalkeeper change, 205(c)'s by a goalkeeper who went to the bench — and the goalie-for-skater pull this document is about is caught by neither. Read with Rule 638 Tied Games, whose (a)–(d) set out overtime and shoot-out procedure, leave length and format to "Affiliates and Local Governing Bodies", and say nothing about the goalkeeper. And in the separate Casebook, Rule 205 Situations 4, 5, 7 and 8: Situation 4 asking when a goalkeeper replaced on the ice by a skater "during play" may re-enter and answering "The goalkeeper can return at any time. Rule Reference 205(a). A goalkeeper may change on the fly during play with a player and return at any time through a proper player change"; Situation 7 the same question for a stoppage substitution, answered "The goalkeeper can return at any time. Rule Reference 205(b)" with the gloss that they may "return as soon as play resumes unless the substitution was made under Rule 205(c)"; and Situation 8 the contrasting goalie-for-goalie case, where the original "must wait until the next stoppage of play to re-enter the game" — ⚠️ its Rule Reference being 205(b), the very limb Situation 7 cites for the opposite answer, so USA Hockey itself reads 205(b)'s two paragraphs as two rules and the wait is carried by the rule text rather than by a Casebook gloss. ⚠️ And the carve-out that runs the other way: the Blind Hockey rules in the book's Official Playing Rules for the Disabled Hockey Disciplines (Section VI), whose Goalkeeper Substitution paragraph gives "two situations where the goalkeeper may be substituted and replaced with an extra skater" — a delayed penalty, where "the non-offending team may add an extra skater while their goalkeeper remains on the ice" and "this extra skater can remain on the ice until the next stoppage of play when the penalty is assessed", and any other substitution, which "must occur during a stoppage in play. Should a goalkeeper attempt to skate off the ice during play, play shall be stopped, and the goalkeeper shall be assessed a minor penalty for delay-of-game." The other five disciplines in that section were read for a goalkeeper-substitution variant of their own, on 2 September 2026, and have none: Deaf/Hard of Hearing "follow the USA Hockey Official Rules of Ice Hockey", Standing Amputee states "There are no modifications to typical USA Hockey playing rules", Warrior "follows USA Hockey Adult playing rules", Sled writes its own permissive Substitution of Players paragraph ("Players may be changed at any time during play from the players’ bench") that says nothing about the goalkeeper, and Special Hockey runs the other way again — its A Level Games bullet expressly contemplates the pull, each team having five skaters and a goaltender "unless the goalkeeper is pulled for an extra attacker", while its B and C Level bullets are silent rather than prohibitive. No USA Hockey counterpart to the NHL's and the IIHF's post-icing line-change ban was found: Rule 204(a) and the Glossary entry "Line Change Procedure" both give each team its five seconds at every stoppage, with no icing carve-out, and Rule 624 is the only icing rule; Rule 636(f), the single 60-second time-out per team, which attaches no icing condition to it; and Rule 610(c), which reaches only a player who "delays the game by deliberately shooting or batting the puck outside the playing area", read with Rule 631(d), under which a puck "accidentally shot or deflected out of play" brings only "a last play face-off"; Rule 614(c), read 31 August 2026 — the goalkeeper's freezing rule, whose minor for delay of game runs on four triggers and not one: the puck "behind the goal line and their body … entirely outside of the goal crease", a failure "to play the puck with their stick when provided the opportunity to do so prior to being pressured by an attacking player", the puck "outside the boundaries of the 'goalkeeper's privileged' area", and holding or placing it "against any part of the goal frame or boards" or on the back of the netting — with the Note defining the privileged area "by connecting the end zone face-off spots with an imaginary line and imaginary lines from each face-off spot running perpendicular to the end boards", read with, in the separate USA Hockey Official Rules and Casebook 2025-29 (PDF), Rule 614 Situations 6, 7, 11, 12 and 14, also read 31 August 2026: Situation 14 answering that the privileged area does "include the area behind the goal line" and "extends to the closer end boards", Situation 12 that "if the puck is behind the goal line or outside of the privileged area, a minor penalty for delaying the game must be assessed", Situation 6 that a goalkeeper who falls on a loose puck inside the privileged area is penalised because they have "an obligation to play the puck with their stick, just like any other player", and Situations 7 and 11 carrying the two rulings that run the other way — no penalty where "some part of the goalkeeper's body is in contact with the goal crease when initial contact with the puck is made", and none where the attacking team "is in a position to pressure the goalkeeper"; and, on the net-front pick, Rule 625, whose Note defines interference as using the body "('pick' or 'block') to impede the progress of an opponent (non-puck carrier) with no effort to play the puck, maintain normal foot speed or maintain an established skating lane" and whose only penalty limb is 625(a)'s minor — the rule writes no major, game misconduct or match tier of its own. ⚠️ 625(a)'s first enumerated instance names the net-front screen directly, read 7 September 2026: "Providing a protective screen and limiting the opportunity for an opposing player to apply pressure to a teammate in possession or control of the puck." That clause has no counterpart in the NHL or IIHF books — "protective screen" returns zero from both, flattened, against a working control — and the Casebook publishes no situation on it. Its only occurrence in that volume is the reprinted rule text at Rule 625; the volume runs seventeen situations under Rule 625, and they cite 625(a.5 or 6), (a.7), (a.8), (a.9), 625(b) and 625(c) between them. The conclusion does not rest on that enumeration: the string 625(a.1) appears nowhere in the volume at all, on a flattened whole-volume search, while 601(a.1) returns to show the search shape works. Read with the four body-position bullets in the Declaration of Player Safety, Fair Play & Respect, under Competitive Contact Category — the nearest USA Hockey comes to the NHL's 56.1 entitlement, and not written into any rule: a skater "is entitled to the ice they occupy so long as they maintain their skating speed and body position between an opponent and the loose puck", "is entitled to stand their ground and is not required to move if an opponent wishes to skate through that area of the ice", "may block an opponent so long as they are in front of the opponent and moving in the same direction", and "can use their body position while maintaining their skating lane, to force an opponent to take a less direct route to the puck, so long as they do not use a hand or arm to hold or block the opponent" — all four introduced by "[l]egal competitive contact occurs when players are focused on gaining possession of the puck and are simply maintaining legally established body position", and echoed in the Standard of Play and Rule Emphasis Summary, a different section, as "[p]layers are entitled to the ice they occupy as long as they are able to maintain their own foot speed and body position between opponent and puck." The tiers come from elsewhere in the book, and the routing is written down. The Declaration of Player Safety, Fair Play & Respect (Body Checking) directs that "Infractions that occur as a result of a body check delivered to a vulnerable or defenseless player must be penalized under the boarding, charging, checking from behind, head contact or roughing rules", and that "When done in a dangerous, careless or reckless (unacceptable) manner where the player delivering the check has made no effort to play the puck, the major plus game misconduct or match penalty provisions of these rules must be assessed"; the same section defines "Vulnerable or Defenseless" as a skater "unaware, unprepared, or unsuspecting of an impending hit". The Standard of Play and Rule Emphasis – Restraining Fouls section lists as an example of interference "Using the body to establish a 'pick' or 'block' that prevents an opponent from being able to chase a puck carrier." Roughing is Rule 640: 640(g), "A major plus a game misconduct penalty shall be assessed to any player who recklessly endangers an opponent as a result of any actions falling under Rule 640(b, c, d, e or f)", and 640(h), "A match penalty for reckless endangerment may also be assessed under sub-sections (b), (c), (d), (e) or (f) of this rule." ⚠️ Note the scope of 640's own sub-sections: (b), the avoidable check on a player no longer in control of the puck, is written "(except Adult Male Classifications)", while (d) — a body check "with no effort to gain possession of the puck" where the stick blade is above the knees — and (e) — a check on an opponent physically engaged for the puck with others — carry no such limit. And Rule 602(a) sits outside 625 and 640 both: "A match penalty shall be assessed to any player or team official who recklessly endangers or attempts to injure any opposing player or team official", tied to no named foul · IIHF Official Rule Book 2025/26 (PDF) — the rule set British hockey plays under: Rule 27.7 (goalkeeper restricted area), Rule 63.2(VI) and its Note — the same rule as the NHL’s 63.2(vi) in the plural, reaching a goalkeeper who "races out" of the goal crease and "instead of playing the puck jumps on the puck", with the same save-then-cover Note, Rule 56.1 (interference — materially identical to NHL 56.1 on body position, the stick/free-hand/illegal-check proviso and picks; the IIHF writes the body-position sentence in the plural, "A Player is allowed the ice they are standing on (body position) and are not required to move"), Rule 56.4 (major penalty — available where the Player "recklessly endangers the fouled Player in a way that at the discretion of the Referee such Player would not be sufficiently sanctioned by imposing a minor penalty"; the IIHF's trigger is reckless endangerment where the NHL's 56.4 is the degree of violence. ⚠️ The sufficiency test is the operative half of that sentence, and it makes the IIHF's major the narrower of the two. The NHL's 56.4 major needs only the degree of violence and no endangerment at all; the IIHF's needs reckless endangerment and the Referee's judgement that a minor would not suffice), Rule 56.5 (major plus game misconduct — the Referee "may assess a major penalty and a game misconduct penalty if, in their judgment, the Player recklessly endangers their opponent by an 'interference or a late-hit' and the Player would not be sufficiently sanctioned by imposing a major penalty", the assessment resting on "the severity of the infraction, severity of the contact, the degree of violence and the general reprehensibility involved". ⚠️ The rule number and the injury condition both differ from the NHL's: the NHL's game misconduct for interference is its 56.5 and requires an injury of an opponent; the IIHF's 56.5 requires none), Rule 81.1 (icing, including the same hybrid-icing sentence as the NHL and the "gain the line" test — the puck on a stick, not a skate, contacting the centre red line), Rule 81.4 and Rule 87.1 (no substitution and no time-out after your own icing — 87.1's icing sentence and its two companion cases are the NHL's in the same words, but 81.4 is not: the IIHF grants a fourth substitution exception the NHL lacks, "to replace a goalkeeper who had been substituted for an extra attacker, to replace an injured Player, a Player with a broken skate, or when a penalty has been assessed which affects the on-ice strength of either team", against the NHL's "to replace a goalkeeper who had been substituted for an extra attacker, to replace an injured player, or when a penalty has been assessed which affects the on-ice strength of either team" — both books open that list with the goalkeeper limb — though the IIHF's own Rule 82.1 restates the same ban with only the three and does not repeat the broken skate, a disagreement inside one book that neither edition resolves; Faceoffs sets out how the two rules read together), Rule 81.6 (numerical strength — two paragraphs only, with no major-penalty carve-out; the second paragraph governs only the instant an expiring penalty ends), Rule 20.3 (substitution — after a major the offending team "must place a substitute in the penalty box immediately", and the rule attaches no icing consequence to that requirement), Rule 83.1 (off-side, including the "plane" of the blue line and the unbroken-plane skate), Rule 83.3 (delayed off-side — the same four triggers as the NHL's, in the same sentence, differing only in pronoun), Rule 84.2 (overtime extra attacker — a single permissive sentence, with no bar on returning on the fly), and Rule 63.2(III), which carries the NHL's defending-zone puck-out-of-play minor in the same terms and not word for word: the determining-factor sentence and both Note carve-outs match, but its own carve-out reads "except where there is no protective glass" against the NHL's "no glass", and its bench clause penalises a puck "shot over the protective glass surrounding the Players' bench" against the NHL's "behind" — "surrounding" being the wider of the two — verified unchanged in the IIHF Official Rule Book 2026/27 (Version 1.0, June 2026), which was read for that rule and nothing else · IIHF Situation Handbook 2025/26 (Version 1.1, August 2025), read for the bench limb of the puck-out-of-play minor and nothing else — Situation 63.24, which still assesses the minor where a clear goes over the glass and lands in the Players' Bench: "the determining factor when deciding whether a delay of game penalty is to be assessed, is where the puck leaves the playing surface", judged on "an imaginary plane that continues upwards to the roof from the top of the glass", exempting only a puck "shot directly into the Players' Bench (where there is no glass)" — read in the same words in the IIHF Situation Handbook 2026/27. Its Foreword ranks it below the Rulebook — "in case of any contradictions, the valid IIHF Rulebook is always the basis" · IHUK In-House Rules 2026-27, Revision 1 (published 25 July 2026) — the current British document, read 31 August 2026: the Introduction, which adopts the IIHF book "in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (the Home Countries)"; Rule 1, under which "rinks with a non-standard playing surface (below 56 m × 26 m) are authorised by the NGB for all levels of hockey" with Sutton and Coatbridge permitted only up to U16, scoped "This rule applies to all fixtures"; and Rule 84, "overtime is only played in NIHL fixtures and in SNL fixtures where specifically provided for in competition regulations." The In-House Rules make no amendment to IIHF Rule 27 (goalkeeper's restricted area), Rule 81 (Icing) or Rule 83 (Off-side) — searched flattened, in this edition and the last · IHUK In-House Rules 2025-26, Revision 1 — superseded, cited only for the comparison: it carried the same Rule 84, but applied "in England and Scotland" alone, named a third rink (Limekilns Road) and scoped Rule 1 to "all EIH and SIHA fixtures" · IIHF – New Rule Book for global game — the IIHF's own announcement, 5 June 2021, that it would "introduce a new Rule Book for the 2021/22 season", listing among the rules to be integrated "A restricted area for goalkeepers behind the net to create more offensive play (i.e. trapezoid familiar to NHL and KHL)". It dates the IIHF's adoption, and it is the only support held here for the KHL — a governing body's aside rather than a KHL rule. Nothing held here dates the NHL's own adoption · England Ice Hockey Rules & Regulations 2024-2025 — Rule 22.3, the Goalkeepers' Restricted Area "not currently enforced" · Hockey Canada Playing Rules 2026-2028 (PDF) — Rule 6.7 Icing: 6.7(a), which calls icing on a team "equal or superior in numerical strength to the opposing team", and 6.7(d), which applies the "'no-change on icing' rule" only "[i]n categories of U18AAA, Junior, and at the option of the Member in Senior" and whose first listed exception is "[t]o replace a Goaltender that has been substituted for an extra attacker"; Rule 6.1 Change of Players, read 2 September 2026 — 6.1(a), "Players may be changed at any time from the Players' Bench, provided that the player or players leaving the ice will be at the Players' Bench (within 3.05m (10 ft.)) and out of play before any change is made", read with the book's Interpretation 1 to Rule 6.1(b), "Changing goaltenders 'on the fly', while play is in progress, is governed by the same rules that apply to the changing of players" — the interpretation is printed against 6.1(b), which is about the Penalty Bench, but the rule it construes is 6.1(a). Hockey Canada writes no goaltender-substitution rule of its own and attaches no overtime condition to the change: Rule 6.16 Tied Game provides only for sudden-victory overtime periods, records that "Members and leagues may make their own rules regarding overtime for games under their jurisdiction", and says nothing about the goalkeeper. ⚠️ Searched by concept rather than by rule number, and with a vocabulary control: Hockey Canada writes goaltender (369 occurrences) and almost never goalkeeper (4), so a goalkeeper search returns a false silence; Rule 6.11 Off-side, whose preamble counts only "the player's skate(s) that are in physical contact with the ice surface", and Rule 6.11(b)(ii) — the stop-play clause, which ends a delayed off-side only where an attacker "touches the puck or attempts to gain possession of a loose puck while the puck is still in the attacking zone", with no pressure limb and no contact limb. ⚠️ Rule 6.11(b) carries two separate i./ii. lists, so "6.11(b)(ii)" names two different rules: the tag-up clause sits under "the Linesperson will drop their arm to nullify the off-side violation and allow play to continue if", and the stop-play clause sits under "During a delayed offside, if". Also Rule 8.3(b) Interference, which allows a major plus a game misconduct "at the discretion of the Referee, based on the degree of violence of the impact" and makes that mandatory where the infraction injures an opponent, and Rule 8.3(c), "A Match penalty will be assessed to any player who attempts to injure or deliberately injures an opponent by interference" — a tier the IIHF book does not write at all, "match penalt" returning zero hits in both IIHF editions held here, searched 2 September 2026. Rule 8.3 is the rule that defines a "late hit". Its opening also carries "Players of the team in possession of the puck may not run deliberate interference for the puck carrier", and Hockey Canada writes no body-position doctrine into its interference rule at all — the book's single use of the phrase is in Rule 8.1 Holding, where an arm used "in a strength move, by blocking their opponent" is permitted "provided they have body position". And Rule 10.1 Delay of Game, read in full — its clauses (a)–(e) place no limit on where a goaltender may play the puck, Hockey Canada marking no trapezoid, though Interpretation 3 to Rule 10.1(a) does restrict them, in five clauses read whole on 2 September 2026: clause i, "[a] goaltender may freeze the puck in the goal crease when under pressure from attacking players"; clause ii, "[t]he goaltender may come out of their crease to cut down the angle and catch the shot or, after stopping the shot, cover the puck"; clause iii, a minor "after one warning" for freezing in the crease when not under pressure; clause iv, the goaltender who comes out "to beat an attacking player to the puck and simply jumps on the puck, causing a stoppage of play", penalty with "[n]o warning ... in this instance"; and clause v, "[w]hen a goaltender leaves their crease, they will not be allowed to freeze the puck. If they do, they will be assessed a Minor penalty. No warning will be issued." The Interpretation states its own intent one line above clause i: "to eliminate unnecessary stoppages caused by the goaltender." It was also read for a defending-zone puck-out-of-play limb, of which it has none: 10.1(ii) reaches only "a player who deliberately shoots, bats, or throws the puck outside the playing surface", with no zone limit, and the direct limb that writes no deliberateness word, 10.1(v), names "a goaltender who shoots or bats the puck directly out of the playing surface, with their stick" — the word "glass" appearing in Rule 10.1 only in Interpretation 5 to 10.1(a), which is about the goaltender's limb and carves out only the no-glass, glass-touch and deflection cases. Also its Glossary, for who "a player" is in 10.1(ii): "PLAYERS: The members of the team physically participating in the game. The goaltender is considered a player, except where explicitly stated because special rules or privileges apply to them." The same page shows the express-exclusion form the book uses when it means to exclude them — "POSSESSION: The state of a player, except the goaltender, who is the last one to have come in contact with the puck." Rule 10.1 names a goaltender at 10.1(v), at 10.1(vi) and in its unnumbered Players' Bench paragraph, and not at 10.1(ii); the reading that 10.1(ii) therefore reaches a goaltender is this document's reading of the text, and no Interpretation states it. · CARHA Hockey Official Rule Book, printed 2020 (PDF) — Rule 73(d) (Passes and Off-side Passes): "For the purpose of 2-line passes, the red line will not be in play. It will still be in effect for icing." Also Rule 66(a), Note 2, read 7 September 2026: "Often the action and movement of the attacking player causes the interference, since the defending players are entitled to 'stand their ground' or 'shadow' the attacking players. Players of the side in possession of the puck shall not be allowed to 'run' deliberate interference for the puck carrier." The one standalone recreational-league book held here, and it abolishes the two-line pass rather than keeping it.

Breakout systems and options: Five Breakout Plays Every Hockey Player Should Know — How To Hockey · Breakout Options — Playbook7 · Hockey 101: Defensive Zone Breakout Basics — Beer League Tips · Breakout Plays: The Transition Game — Cross Ice Hockey · Tactical Formations: Breakout — Silver Seven · Breakout Hockey Drills — Ice Hockey Systems

Winger and centre roles: The Winger's 4-Step Execution Plan for Successful Breakouts — Built For Hockey · Breakouts: Center Support — Hockey IQ Newsletter (Greg Revak) · Weakside Winger Breakout: The Slash — Hockey IQ Newsletter (Greg Revak) · Breakout Tips for Wingers on Strong Side — Ice Hockey Systems · Breakout Tips for Centers — Ice Hockey Systems

Forechecks and how they defeat breakouts: Hockey Forecheck Systems: 1-2-2 vs 2-1-2 vs 1-3-1 Guide — ⚠️ provenance note, checked 2 September 2026: HTTP 200, quotation "the 1-2-2 is the most widely used forecheck in hockey" located in the rendered body; a bogus article slug on the same host returns a genuine HTTP 404, so the 200 is real. But it is a blog post on a multi-sport coaching-equipment retailer's site, published 5 July 2026 as one of a weekly series, credited to "The HoopsKing Team" rather than a named author, containing zero occurrences of "according to", "study", "research", "data" or "source", and closing with an advertisement for custom whiteboards. Its F1/F2/F3 terminology is correct hockey; it is not authority for a prevalence claim · 1-2-2 Forecheck: Against All Breakouts — Leslie Global Sports · 2-1-2 Forecheck: Against All Breakouts — Leslie Global Sports · Breaking the 1-2-2 and Trap Forecheck (Denis Savard) — Ice Hockey Systems

Zone-exit and zone-entry research: Why Possession is the Key to Zone Exits — Hockey Graphs (~230,000 tracked NHL exits; ~89% vs ~20% follow-on entry rates — the article's wording is that carry-outs and pass-outs work "almost nine times out of ten" while dump-outs work "just one in five times", and that a carry or pass-out is "almost 4 times as likely to work as a dump-out". The underlying tracking is Corey Sznajder's manual dataset, roughly half the games of the 2016-17 and 2017-18 seasons — Hockey Graphs is the analysis, not the tracker; checked 28 July 2026) · Crucial Habits: Shot Generation & Controlled Zone Exits · Eric Tulsky, Geoffrey Detweiler, Robert Spencer and Corey Sznajder, Using Zone Entry Data To Separate Offensive, Neutral, And Defensive Zone Performance, 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference (330 hand-tracked NHL games, 2011-12; 0.53–0.62 shots per carry-in against 0.22–0.28 per dump-in — all four figures taken from the PDF itself). Note that the sloansportsconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/… copy of this paper returns HTTP 404; the link above is the working hockeyanalytics.com mirror, which is also the copy Zone Entries cites. · Passing clusters: A Framework to Evaluate a Team's Breakout — Daniel Weinberger, Hockey Graphs, 22 October 2019 — the one source found here that compares two named breakout options against each other rather than controlled exits against clears. It is KHL data, not NHL, and covers successful passes only, the author stating that "any analysis that only focuses on successful events is inherently flawed"; his per-100-possession table gives Up 12,180 possessions / 15.6 dump-outs / 53% neutral-zone possession / 32% offensive-zone / 17.4 shots / 0.68 xG against Rim 9,298 / 14.4 / 38% / 24% / 13.1 / 0.54, with the conclusion "Rims are a lot less efficient." His turnover explanation — "rims are much more likely to result in a turnover" — is reasoning, not measurement, because failed passes are absent from the dataset; retrieved 2 September 2026, HTTP 200. He also names KHL clubs' breakout tendencies by cluster, and closes by describing a full taxonomy of breakout patterns as work still to be done, which is why the ranking of all nine options in this document remains coaching judgement · Cited in full in Zone Entries

Faceoff and communication: Wheel Reverse Defensive Zone Face-Off — Ice Hockey Systems · Faceoffs: Defensive Zone — Weiss Tech Hockey (Jeremy Weiss) — refetched 2 September 2026, HTTP 200, no redirect. ⚠️ Nothing here is quoted from it, and little could be: the retrievable text is a five-sentence introduction (posted 12 September 2011) above an embedded video, and the rest of the page is nine reader comments. The systems content is the video — "Defensive Zone Faceoffs", Weiss's own — which the page still embeds through a Flash <object>, so it is neither readable as text nor playable in a current browser; a "pdf Playbook" is referred to only inside a comment, and is not linked on the page. Most of the words on it are third-party commenters' rather than Weiss's, so a quotation lifted from this page would very likely not be the named source's. An Internet Archive copy of 10 May 2026 renders to the identical 3,752 characters, so the page has not changed · Goalie Breakout Calls — The Coaches Site (Kelvin Cech) — the source for "up", "over" and "leave it", for the two-syllable argument behind "leave it", and for the two things the goalie section leans on: that the vocabulary is something a team sets rather than assumes ("Let's set a standard first"; the drill is "to get your goalies and defence on the same page"), and that lateness is the cost ("A split second's delay can be the difference between breaking out of the zone and fishing the biscuit out of the basket"). ⚠️ It does not support "loud" — that is this guide's own call discipline, carried in On-Ice Communication, not Cech's. Refetched 29 August 2026, HTTP 200, quotations located in the rendered body

Delayed penalties and the extra attacker: Delayed Penalties: What They Mean and How to Take Advantage · Extra attacker — Wikipedia

Control breakouts: Mike Johnston and Ryan Walter, Hockey Plays and Strategies, 2nd ed. (Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2019) — a coaching manual, and therefore convention only; no rule in this document comes from it. It is the source for the three named patterns — blue-to-blue stretch, strong-side slant and three high — for the two conditions a control breakout depends on, and for the coaching advice to drill one rather than carry all three. The patterns are described for the player skating them rather than for the coach drawing them.

James Bloom, "Breakouts", Learning to Play the Game. https://learn-ice-hockey.com/systems/breakouts/ — licensed CC BY-NC 4.0.

<a href="https://learn-ice-hockey.com/systems/breakouts/">Breakouts</a> by <a href="https://github.com/jamesdbloom">James Bloom</a>, licensed under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/">CC BY-NC 4.0</a>.

@misc{systems-breakouts,
  author  = {James Bloom},
  title   = {Breakouts},
  howpublished = {Learning to Play the Game},
  url     = {https://learn-ice-hockey.com/systems/breakouts/},
  note    = {Licensed CC BY-NC 4.0}
}